100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
HUMN 303 Week 7 Assignment: Reflection – What Is Art? $10.99   Add to cart

Other

HUMN 303 Week 7 Assignment: Reflection – What Is Art?

1 review
 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Instructions Although controversial art is not a topic exclusive to the 20th and 21st centuries, the distribution of information regarding controversial art has increased with the proliferation of media. Choose an example of a controversial work of art from the 20th or 21st centuries from any disci...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • February 16, 2022
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Other
  • Unknown

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: crystalgoodrich • 1 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: ProfGoodlucK • 1 year ago

Thanks for the review, Happy studies and also refer others to my page

avatar-seller
HUMN 303N Week 7 Assignment: Reflection –
What Is Art?


Although controversial art is not a topic exclusive to the 20th century, the distribution of information
regarding controversial art has increased with the proliferation of media. Please discuss an example of a
20th century controversial work of art from any discipline of the humanities (music, literature, sculpture,
film, etc.) and an accompanying statement from the artist(s). Based on your example, to what extent does
controversial art make a social contribution? Are governments ever justified in censoring art?

Controversial art includes music, movies, essays, novels, poems, paintings, sculptures, and so
forth. Can a controversial piece of art ever make a social contribution? Does it depend on the
nature of the controversy?



The example that I chose of controversial art is The Holy Virgin Mary by Chris Ofili. In this
piece of art, the portrayed Virgin is a black woman surrounded by putti (winged cherubs) with
bare bottoms and genitalia cut out of pornographic magazines. Two balls of elephant dung
support the painting inscribed with the works “Virgin” and “Mary” and a third clump defining
one of her breasts (Sayre, 2013, p. 492). The piece reflected Ofili’s African heritage while
showcasing female organs and divinities to symbolize the fertility of the Virgin Mary. It was
blasphemous and anti-Catholic to many spectators and was even smeared by white paint by an
angry spectator while on display in Brooklyn. The Catholic community was outraged that
someone would depict art related to their sacred Virgin Mary in such a way, especially with the
use of elephant dung and clippings from pornographic magazines. The mayor of New York of
that time threatened to cut off funding and even evict the museum it was displayed in from it’s
city-owned building. Although these tactics were meant to hurt Ofili’s presence in the art
community as well as his art work, he only gained more attention and prominence.
This piece of art made a great social contribution in the sense that art is whatever the artist
intends it to be. As stated by Ofili himself on the Art Newspaper webpage, “As an altar boy, I
was confused by the idea of a holy Virgin Mary giving birth to a young boy. Now when I go to
the National Gallery and see paintings of the Virgin Mary, I see how sexually charged they are.
Mine is simply a hip-hop version” (Miller, 2018). Artists have the freedom to showcase what
they want and however they want to. It may cause controversy among others, but that’s the
artist’s own prerogative. Art is a form of freedom of speech in sense, and although the
Government can play a role in censoring some forms, it doesn’t take away from the fact that the
art comes from the artists own point of view, whether their intentions are seen appropriately or
not. In my opinion there may be some reasons in which the Government may be justified in
censoring art but majority of the time it goes against the artists freedom of speech.


References
Miller, J. H., 2018, “Controversial ‘hip-hop version’ of the Virgin Mary given to MoMa.” The
Art Newspaper. Retrieved from https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/steve-cohen-gives-chris-
ofili-s-virgin-mary-to-moma

This study source was downloaded by 100000829957125 from CourseHero.com on 02-15-2022 22:44:33 GMT -06:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/39303271/discussion-week-7-1docx/

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ProfGoodlucK. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76669 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.99
  • (1)
  Add to cart