Exam (elaborations)
NR 439 Week 4 discussion post 1&2 Sampling
- Course
- Institution
NR 439 Week 4 discussion post 1&2 Sampling
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
instructor
Reviews received
Content preview
NR 439 Week 4 discussion post 1&2 SamplingThe most common sampling method is the convenience sample, therefore, many of the studies that
you find for evidence use this sampling method. What are the implications for using a convenience
sample on the way you interpret and use the findings?
Professor and classmates,
This week’s lesson teaches us about sampling and how we begin to implement our plan. First, a
population to investigate must be picked; then a sample of that population must be chosen. There are
two types of populations: Probability (AKA Random) or Nonprobability sampling (CCN, 2016). Non-
probability sampling involves two types that we call the Convenience sample and the Purposive sample.
The Convenience sample is one of the most common methods (CCN, 2016). The subjects are chosen out
of “Convenience” and are accessible to the researcher which is why the group is thusly named (CCN;
Houser, 2015, p. 169).
According to Houser (2015), convenience sampling is used in pilot studies (p. 169). In last week’s lesson
the research article Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-
management discussed how the use of applications on Apple iPad technology that support diabetes self-
management will increase self-efficacy for self-management, increase participation in self-management
behaviors, and improve diabetes outcomes in persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Hunt, Sanderson, &
Ellison, 2014, p. 232). This research was a pilot study that used convenience sampling (Hunt, Sanderson,
& Ellison, p. 236).
Reference
Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2016). NR-439 Week 4 lesson: Reading Research Literature – Sampling
and Ethics [Online lesson]. Downers Grove, IL: DeVry Education Group.
Houser, J. (2015). The sampling strategy. Nursing research: Reading, using and creating evidence (3rd ed.,
p. 169). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., & Ellison, K. (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to
improve self- management. MedSurg Nursing, 23(4), 231–237. Retrieved
from http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller instructor. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
80461 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now