100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
ACC-331 Pearson Midterm Exam 2022 update Questions and Answers | 100% correct $15.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

ACC-331 Pearson Midterm Exam 2022 update Questions and Answers | 100% correct

 66 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A friend notices that you are reading the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Your friend inquires why you are consulting a 1986 publication, especially when tax laws change so frequently. What is your response? A. It is updated for every statutory change to Title 26 subsequent to 1986. Therefore it ...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 16  pages

  • January 31, 2022
  • 16
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
A friend notices that you are reading the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Your friend inquires
why you are consulting a 1986 publication, especially when tax laws change so frequently. What
is your response?
A. It is updated for every statutory change to Title 26 subsequent to 1986. Therefore it
includes the post-1986 tax law changes enacted by Congress and today reflects the current
state of the law.
B. It is the last time the code was published, therefore it is easier to read Title 26 of 1986 first,
and then research updated tax law for anything newer in the committee reports.
C. It is always the first place you should start any research project.
D. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is the first time the statutory law was printed in one book,
or as Title 26, and is therefore the only way to find the codification of laws.

Requirement
Provide the proper citations (including both primary and secondary citations where applicable)
for the authorities listed below. (For secondary citations, reference both the AFTR and USTC.)
(Ignore lack of italics in selections.)
a.
Rev. Rul. 99-7
b.
Frank H. Sullivan, a Board of Tax Appeals decision
c.
Tate & Lyle, Inc., a 1994 Tax Court decision
d.
Ralph L. Rogers v. U.S., a U.S. district court decision
e.
Norman Rodman v. CIR, a Second Circuit Court decision
a. Rev. Rul. 99-7
Citation:
Rev. Rul. 99-7, 1999-1 C.B. 361.

b. Frank H. Sullivan, a Board of Tax Appeals decision
Citation:
Frank H. Sullivan, 1 B.T.A. 93 (1924).

c. Tate & Lyle, Inc., a 1994 Tax Court decision
Citation:
Tate and Lyle, Inc., 103 T.C. 656 (1994).

d. Ralph L. Rogers v. U.S., a U.S. district court decision
Citation:
Ralph L. Rogers v. U.S., 539 F. Supp. 104, 49 AFTR 2d 82-1160, 82-1 USTC ¶ 9246 (DC
OH, 1982).

e. Norman Rodman v. CIR, a Second Circuit Court decision
Citation:
Norman Rodman v. CIR, 542 F.2d 845, 38 AFTR 2d 76-5840, 76-2 USTC ¶ 9710 (2nd Cir.,
1976).

,List four methods of searching the CHECKPOINT and INTELLICONNECT databases.
A. Citation, date, keyword, or author
B. Keyword, index, citation, or content
C. Groupings, date, author, or content
D. Author, groupings, citation, or content


Rev. Rul. 2001-29 interprets Section(s) 355 and 856.


What two functions does a citator serve?
A. Citators (1) assist in internet-based tax research by grouping words together and (2) list
common words together during a search so you can refine your results after the initial query.
B. Citators (1) trace the history of the case in question and (2) assist in internet-based tax
research by grouping words together.
C. Citators (1) trace the history of the case in question and (2) list other authorities that
have cited such cases.
D. Citators (1) list common words together during a search so you can refine your results after
the initial query and (2) list other authorities that have cited such cases.

Describe two ways that the information available from the CHECKPOINT citator differs from
that available from the INTELLICONNECT citator.
A. CHECKPOINT indicates how the case in question was cited, when INTELLICONNECT only
lists the case for the researcher to read themselves.
B. CHECKPOINT lists all citing cases, however INTELLICONNECT which just lists those that
the editors believe will serve as precedent.
C. CHECKPOINT allows the researcher to enter case names or case citations. Unlike
INTELLICONNECT which only allows a researcher to enter case citations.
D. Both A and B.


Look up Bush Brothers & Co., 73 T.C. 424 (1979) and answer the questions below.
Requirements
a. Was the case reviewed by the court? If so, was the decision unanimous? Explain.
b. Was the decision entered under Rule 155?
c. Consult a citator. Was the case reviewed by an appellate court? If so, which one?
Requirement a. Was the case reviewed by the court? If so, was the decision unanimous? Explain.
A. Yes. The case was reviewed by the court. The decision was not unanimous. Judge Quealy
dissented. Judge Tannenwald issued a concurring opinion with which five judges agreed.
Judge Chabot issued a dissenting opinion with which three judges agreed, and Judge Nims
issued a dissenting opinion with which three judges agreed.
B. Yes. The case was reviewed by the court. The decision was unanimous. Judge Chabot issued a
dissenting opinion with which all judges agreed.
C. No. The case was not reviewed by the court.
D. Yes. The case was reviewed by the court. The decision was unanimous. Judge Tannenwald
issued a concurring opinion with which all judges agreed.

, Requirement b. Was the decision entered under Rule 155?
No. The decision was not entered under Rule 155.

Requirement c. Consult a citator. Was the case reviewed by an appellate court? If so, which one?
Yes. The case was reviewed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1982.

Debate the following proposition: All corporate formation transactions should be taxable events.
Select the pro's for this debate. (Select all that apply.)
A. Making a corporate formation a taxable event decreases tax revenues.
B. This change eliminates the need for taxpayers to artificially structure transaction to
avoid Sec. 351 to recognize gains and/or losses.
C. Simplification is achieved by eliminating one of the two options - whether a transaction
is taxable or not. This change will make administration of the tax laws easier.
D. A corporate formation is a deemed stock purchase; therefore, parties to this stock purchase do
not have to recognize gains or losses until they leave the corporation.

Select the con's for this debate. (Select all that apply.)
A. With taxation, businesses would be encouraged to incorporate because of the tax benefits that
boost economic growth in the U.S.
B. This change would hurt start-up corporations by reducing their capital through the
income tax paid by transferors on an asset transfer.
C. Taxpayers are required to recognize losses under the current system, thereby decreasing
revenues to the government.
D. With taxation, corporations will have to raise more capital because transferors of
noncash property will have reduced capital to invest and because money must be diverted
to pay taxes.

In 2013, Mick, George, and Lesley form Zeus Corporation. Mick contributes land (a capital
asset) having a $62,500 FMV in exchange for 100 shares of Zeus stock. He purchased the land
in 2011 for $140,000. George contributes machinery (Sec. 1231 property purchased in 2010)
having a $130,000 adjusted basis and a $37,500 FMV in exchange for 90 shares of Zeus stock.
Lesley contributes services worth $25,000 in exchange for 10 shares of Zeus stock.

Read the requirements.
Requirement a. What is the amount of Mick's recognized gain or loss?
Mick realizes a $77,500 loss and recognizes no gain or loss.

Requirement b. What is Mick's basis in his Zeus shares? When does his holding period begin?
Mick's basis in the Zeus shares is $140,000 and his holding period for the stock begins in
2011.

Requirement c. What is the amount of George's recognized gain or loss?
George realizes a $92,500 loss and recognizes no gain or loss.

Requirement d. What is George's basis in his Zeus shares? When does his holding period begin?
George's basis in the Zeus shares is $130,000 and his holding period for the stock begins in 2010.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller abram23. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $15.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83637 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$15.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart