100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
NR-501 Week 2 Discussion: Ways of Knowing (2 Versions){100%} $9.47   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

NR-501 Week 2 Discussion: Ways of Knowing (2 Versions){100%}

 18 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

NR-501 Week 2 Discussion: Ways of Knowing (2 Versions) Nursing knowledge is classified in a variety of ways, one of which is Carper’s Patterns of Knowing (Carper,1978). Carper’s framework offers a lens through which the nurse can reflect upon insights acquired through empirical, ethical, person...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • January 23, 2022
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
Week two Discussion Theory

Think of a surprising or challenging practice situation in which you felt underprepared,
unprepared, or uncomfortable. Select an important nursing issue/topic that was inherent to
the identified situation.

Last year I took care of a 20-year-old male with metastatic testicular cancer for almost three
months. The nursing issue inherent to this situation is an ethical dilemma relating to a lack of
understanding of prognosis and false hopeYour text here 1
of recovery.

Briefly explain the situation

The patient was transferred to our facility for extracorpeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due
to refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Patient was receiving a chemotherapy that severely
damaged the function of his heart and lungs. Patient was given hope that ECMO would allow his
heart and lungs to rest and heal, which is true. Venous arterial ECMO has a higher rate of
survival than not using the treatment. The dilemma is the side effects and complications that can
occur from ECMO and the fact that the patient had a terminal diagnosis. He was on ECMO for
82 days. While in the hospital he developed a stage IV pressure injury and had a fasciotomy of
the left lower leg due to compartment syndrome from being on vasopressors. After he went to
surgery for the fasciotomies and debridement of the pressure injury, he was started on continuous
renal replacement therapy (CRRT). The patient and his family (from Mexico) were being told his
wounds were looking better and the doctors wanted to continue with the ECMO to give patient
more time to recover. They were not discussing the CRRT in rounds. There were some heated
discussions between nurses and residents about the medical interventions and nursing was
ignored. After 75 days of ECMO and no signs of improvement of patient’s heart and lung
functions an ethics and palliative care consult was made after patient and family visited with a
chaplain. The patient died after 82 days of ECMO when the line was lost, and he hemorrhaged.
The parent’s and patient’s biggest fear was him dying alone and he did.

Identify the nursing issue inherent in the identified situation

The issue inherent to this situation is that the voices of multiple nurses were not heard or respected.
It felt like the patient was an experiment since the ECMO team had not ever had a patient on
ECMO this long and none of them were discussing the fact that patient failed every trial of weaning
off ECMO, even after coding twice. They refused to give up; maybe it was a combination of ego
and the patient’s youth.

As a method of refection, use Carper's Patterns of Knowing to analyze the situation. In your
discussion, address ONE of the following Patterns of Knowing: What was one personal belief
that impacted your actions? (Ethics)

I had a hard time separating the ways of knowing and choosing one to discuss. Emotion influences
actions (Carvalho, Hamilton, Burke, McDonald & Griggs, 2020). Ethical knowing is a moral
element which aligns with Nightingale’s question of what a nurse ought to do in each situation
(Jacobs, 2013). Everyone was emotional in this situation and with good reason. This was a young



This study source was downloaded by 100000832361371 from CourseHero.com on 01-22-2022 23:44:48 GMT -06:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/59802548/Week-2-Discussion-Theory-NR501NPdocx/

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller EvaTee. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.47. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72001 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.47
  • (0)
  Add to cart