100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Distinction level Part B of Unit 6 exam January 2022 MOCK 2 (The Fachetti Group) $7.72   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. Business 2016 NQF
  6.  
  7. Unit 6 - Principles of Management

Exam (elaborations)

Distinction level Part B of Unit 6 exam January 2022 MOCK 2 (The Fachetti Group)

6 reviews
 3981 views  22 purchases
  • Course
  • Unit 6 - Principles of Management
  • Institution
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Book
  • BTEC Level 3 National Business Student Book 2

Distinction level Mock question report on The Fachetti Group case study in preparation for the unit 6 exam in January 2022. This is a mock has been looked at and marked by a fully qualified A-Level/BTEC Business teacher. This report was DONE UNDER TIMED CONDITIONS. . Feel free to leave a review. Th...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

Document information

  • January 9, 2022
  • 4
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • unit 6
  • principles of management
  • btec
  • btec
  • business
  • btec business
  • btec business

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

  • Business Level 3 Exam Unit 6 - Principles of Management Full Exam Report Local Gym Plc
  • Summary BTEC Level 3 Unit 6 - Principles of Management- Report and presentation structure guide
  • Unit 7- Business + Decision + Making summary and complete notes
All for this textbook (32)

Written for

  • BTEC
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Business 2016 NQF
  • Unit 6 - Principles of Management
All documents for this subject (130)

6  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: nargesahmadi • 2 year ago

The report and PowerPoint are a copy of each other. This is a scam and misleading. I want a refund.

reply-writer-avatar

By: RihtikSohal • 2 year ago

For this mock the task for the report and slides are very similar hence why there is some copy and pasting. This was also done under timed conditions so this is why some things had to be rushed and copied so it comes out as a realistic model.

review-writer-avatar

By: adnaanpunii08 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: jasonburns • 2 year ago

this essay is not close to a distinction level, there are no numbers mentioned or talk about revenue, net profit etc... the paragraphs are no where near in enough depth as a distinction piece should be - very disappointed and I cannot even get my money back :(

reply-writer-avatar

By: RihtikSohal • 2 year ago

This was marked by a fully qualified teacher. I understand it might not be perfect but I have made it clearly many times I am also a student. It is likely that I have picked up marks in other parts of the mock and that is what picked up these errors.

reply-writer-avatar

By: jasonburns • 2 year ago

how have you been given a distinction without talk of money?? just asked my teacher and he said its most definetely not distinction level

reply-writer-avatar

By: RihtikSohal • 2 year ago

The presentation has talk of money within it. Also as long as a reference they are losing or gaining money it still is considered "relevent in context" so numbers would help but not needed. So i might have lost many like 1 mark and even then not really as i have mentioned other figures from the case study as the topic was about quality standards.

reply-writer-avatar

By: RihtikSohal • 2 year ago

So please it would be nice if you would give me a more reasonable review considering I have proven a fair point here. If not that is understandable and I will respect the decision you make regardless.

review-writer-avatar

By: teachersaddiq • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: kelvinbenjamin • 2 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: RihtikSohal • 2 year ago

Thanks for the review. Feel free to give feedback :)

review-writer-avatar

By: ykay_17 • 2 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: RihtikSohal • 2 year ago

Thanks for the review. Feel free to give feedback :)

Seller

avatar-seller
RihtikSohal

Reviews received

Content preview

This is a formal report regarding the Quality Management at The
Fachetti Group

To: Fabio Fachetti
From: Rihtik Sohal
Date: 08/01/2022

1. Introduction
This report is going to look over Quality Management and its importance to The
fachetti group. This report will also be giving recommendations and proposals which
should be considered and looked into.

The Fachetti Group (TFG) is a restaurant and food manufacturing business. This
business is run by Fabio Fachetti who is a well known established individual as he is
a celebrity chef and TV presenter. He is also famous for his ability to inspire and
engage his staff. TFG is also known for its B2B (business to business) interactions
as they sell large amounts of their products to the UK’s major supermarkets. TFG
was split into 2 separate divisions which were the restaurant division and the
manufacturing division. There are 2 managers who used to run each division. There
is Katrina Szynalski who has been in TFG for 20 years as head chef and manager of
the restaurant division. She takes a democratic leadership and management style.
She worked in an area which had high rent and rates and also paid above average
wages for the instrusty standard which ultimately caused her a lot of cash flow
problems. Katrina is currently the deputy divisional manager for manufacturing. Then
there is Sunny Elder who runs the manufacturing division. Sunny takes an autocratic
leadership style which has resulted in him running a very highly efficient workforce.
In TFG there is a large amount of conflict between the 2 managers as their
leadership styles clash which is an issue which needs to be addressed.

2. Issues
2.1 Conflict between the managers- The two managers Katrina and Sunny have a
conflict which can cause a negative impact on TFG which has a good chance of
hindering the quality of the workforce. As the workforce is not working together TFG
will not be working towards the same goals and this ultimately would bring down the
quality management of TFG as well as their ability to use and work with employees
to a high quality. This can be due to a lack of direction from HR and other elements
which make it so that TFG is not able to run effectively as it could be.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller RihtikSohal. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.72. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

71498 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

CRCST Chapter 9 (Disinfection) with 100% correct answers

$7.72  22x  sold
  • (6)
  Add to cart