Full summary of the secondyear Communication Science course: Media, Society and Politics contains all the lecture notes, articles and the entire book (Making Sense of Media & Politics) that was covered during this course. I read and summarized everything myself. I finished the course with 9 so assu...
Sloppy, literature is wrong + summary literature mainly comes from lectures..
By: emmazorgdrager • 1 year ago
By: sannepaarlberg • 10 months ago
By: annemijngroeneveld • 2 year ago
By: klsandifort • 2 year ago
By: sigridsamenvatting • 2 year ago
By: bibikoopman • 2 year ago
Show more reviews
Seller
Follow
nienkewolfers
Reviews received
Content preview
Media, Maatschappij & Politiek P2
HC1: Introduction power of the media: watchdogs or lapdogs?
Introduction, H1, Chompsky’s Propaganda model
3 perspectives of the book
1+2: political actors
3+4: media
5: public
Five Principles in Political Communication:
1. Political power can usually be translated into power over the news media.
2. When authorities lose control over the political environment they also lose control
over the news.
3. There is no such thing as objective journalism (nor can there be).
4. The media is dedicated more than anything else to telling a good story. This can
often have a major impact on the political process.
5. The most important effects of the news media on citizens tend to be unintentional
and unnoticed.
Chapter 1: political power and power over the media
Those who have political power not only find it much easier to get coverage, but also are in a
much better position to get their messages across.
Ø The news media are more interested in elites, and this preference has far reaching
consequences for the role the media play in politics
Ø Media attention, the rich get richer and the poor remain poor.
The nature of what we call the ‘media’ may have changed considerably after the creation of
the Internet, but the need to be heard remains a central part of the political game.
If you don’t exist in the media, you don’t exist politically
- Become known
- Mobilize supporters
- Influence public opinion
- Influence policy
Media and politics: competitive symbioses
This relationship between political antagonists/actors and the news media can be described
as a ‘competitive symbiosis’. In which each side of the relationship attempts to exploit the
other, while expending a minimum amount of cost. Each side has assets needed by the other
to succeed in its respective role.
Mutual dependence:
- Politicians need good media coverage
- Journalists need information and justification
- 2 theories: Mediatisation and Indexing (HC2)
How much structural do power-holders have? -> Kritiek op boek.
,Obsession with elites limit the range of political discourse
Ø Elites also get more positive coverage: media bias in favour of the powerful
Political power = media power
- Front door: the powerful get more/ automatic media access
- Back door: powerless has to work hard to get into the media
Does the fact that powerful elites get covered more mean that they get covered more
positively? The answer, for the most part, is yes. There are basically two doors for getting
into the news.
1. Front door: VIP’s: people with political power (usually treated with respect). They are
covered because of who they are as much as for what they are doing or sayin
2. Sidedoor: civil disobedience
- Getting your issue discussed in the media
There is one strategy that weaker groups can sometime use to provide news people with
drama without completely sacrificing legitimacy: civil disobedience
3. The other way to get into the news is through the back door.
Ø Reserved for weaker political actors who only become newsworthy if they do
something especially weird or deviant.
Ø The powerful can be pretty boring and still get into the news. But if you are not
important you better be interesting.
Inequality is not accidental: but structural (also in media)
Noam Chomsky: The political economy of mass media
Model Chomsky & Herman argued:
Developed the propaganda model of media criticism, “arguing that market forces,
internalized assumptions of self-censorship”, motivate newspapers and tv network to stifle
dissent.
è They describe US media as business that sell a product (audiences = consumers) to
other business.
è Liberal model of democracy: naïve: not a watchdog, but a lapdog
Media as “democratic watchdog” (Bennet & Serrin, 2005)
- Liberal idea
- Media take initiative
- Investigative reporting
- Independent scrutiny
- Documenting, questioning, and investigating
- Provide public and official with timely information
A well-functioning media is a paramount importance for democratic societies:
- Repost events objectively as they occur, to allow citizens to make informed political
choices.
- Control power-holders and unearth abuses of power through investigative
journalism.
, Herman and Chomsky: US media fails to perform
democratic task and are basically akin to
propaganda system in totalitarian states.
They consider that the media is often involved in
misinformation, and argue that the media has
‘extended’ the Cold War.
Chomsky even contends that the media is in
essence against democracy
Micheal Foucault: “Power is everywhere”: diffused and embodied in discourse, knowledge
and ‘regimes of truth’.
Ø Norms are embedded beyond our perception – causing us to discipline ourselves
without any wilful coercion from others.
Ø Panopticism= the systematic ordering and controlling of human populations through
subtle and often unseen forces (surveillance techniques).
Power = the intentional production of causal effects.
- Power is the ability to achieve one’s goals or objectives.
- Power is (also) the ability to overcome opposition, to exercise control over people
- Power is hierarchical: A gets B to do something that B would not otherwise have
done
Principle & Subaltern
- Power relations are hierarchical/ asymmetric relations between a superior (principle)
and a subordinate (subaltern).
- In power relations there is intentional action of a superior. The subordinate always
has some room to manoeuvre, some freedom and choice to resist.
4 forms of power:
Corrective forms (affecting the OPTIONS for actions)
1. (Physical) force or coercion on decisions or compliance (zero-sum): literally limiting
options.
2. The ability or disposition to change social relationships or to leave them intact, through
manipulation, agenda-setting and non-decisions: changing the basis of choices so it
becomes ‘rational’ to comply.
- Persuasive forms (Affecting the REASONS for actions)
3. Preference-shaping via institutions: ‘signification’ or cognitive symbolism: shaping the
‘meaning’ and significance of things.
, 4. Values-shaping: ‘through control’: the spectrum of actions of the subaltern is limited via
ideological and discursive hegemony and disciplining.
1. Force and coercion
- Physical coercion based on negative bodily and emotional sanctions.
- Violent actions directed against the body or mind of the subaltern (VB: torture,
beating)
- The principal reduces the options of the subaltern to practically zero
- Non-violence directed at limiting the freedom of the subaltern (VB: humiliation)
2. Manipulation and propaganda
- The principal changes the bases on which the subaltern perceives the rational bases
of action without the subaltern noticing it.
- Subaltern chooses on ‘rational’ grounds what the principal wants (VB: propaganda,
advertising and political campaigns)
3. Signification and cognitive symbolism
- Power relations are articulations of meaning (a particular logic of the signification
process)
Framing = the core idea: frames ‘shape individual understanding and public opinion
concering an issue by stressing specific elements or features of the broader controversy
(Nelson, Clawson & Oxley, 1997).
- Frames are ideologically laden packages of truth claims about reality
- Frames compete (in the pluralistic view)
4: Value shaping: dominant ideology
Ideological hegemony = a situation where a particular ideology is pervasively reflected
throughout a society in all principal social institutions, and permeates dominant cultural
ideas and most social relationships.
Ø Herman and Chomsky (private as well as public) US media function as a mechanism
of propaganda through ‘five filters’. Most news that are being broadcast have been
filtered to express the dominant ideology and interests.
These 5 filters produce a very narrow view of the world that is in line with most powerful
economics (and political) interests:
The Herman–Chomsky Propaganda Model: A Critical Approach to Analysing Mass Media
Behaviour
Chomsky: 5 filters of the propaganda-model that determine media content
1. Size and ownership of media companies
2. Advertising
3. Sourcing
4. Flak
5. Anti-ideology and fear
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nienkewolfers. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.07. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
