OCR Religious Studies A Level A* Ontological argument Summary notes
50 views 0 purchase
Course
G571 - AS Philosophy of Religion
Institution
OCR
Book
OCR Religious Studies A Level Year 2
I achieved an A* in the 2021 A Level Religious Studies exam and am now going to study at Imperial College London.
I have uploaded my detailed summary of the AS philosophy topic - The Ontological Argument- which includes the content (AO1) as well as the main strengths and weaknesses of each schol...
A* summary notes on chapter 6 ontological argument OCR Religious Studies
A* Chapter 7 Religious Experience summary notes
Summary notes on Aristotle for OCR A level Religious Studies
All for this textbook (12)
Written for
A/AS Level
OCR
Religious Studies
G571 - AS Philosophy of Religion
All documents for this subject (73)
Seller
Follow
chitambarakarelina
Content preview
The existence of God; arguments based on reason
The ontological argument is a deductive, a priori argument for God’s
existence. The very definition of God logically entails his existence.
However, can we leap from definition (de dicto) to reality (de re)?
Just because a pixie ‘is’ a little man with pointed ears doesn’t mean
a pixie ‘is’, or exists.
ST ANSELM OF CANTERBURY’S ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Medieval monk
OA found in his work Proslogian, a prayer addressed to God
rather than a philosophical thesis
Believed true understanding was only a consequence of faith
Proslogian Chapter 2 is a proof by contradiction;
Anselm refers to the ‘fool’ in the Bible Psalms who says that
he knows the definition of God and what he is supposed to be,
‘that than which no greater can be conceived’ (TTWNGCBC),
but doesn’t think anything with that definition actually exists.
Anselm says that things exist both in the mind and in reality
The fool is contradicting himself because if God is TTWNGCBC,
and he does not exist in reality, he can’t be the greatest thing
that we can think of because existing in reality is greater than
in the mind (a real life painting is better than one in the
painter’s mind + £1 million is better in reality than in the
mind)
In Aristotelian logic, a contradiction is impossible
Therefore; God is TTWNGCBC, it is greater to exist in reality
than in the mind, therefore God exists in reality because a
God in reality is greater than a God only in the mind.
Proslogian Chapter 3 (second form) argues for his necessary
existence;
God is TTWNGCBC. It is greater to have necessary existence
than contingent. Therefore God must have necessary
existence. God exists
STRENGTHS OF ANSELM WEAKNESSES OF ANSELM
If we treat the word God as Guanilo’s criticism
analytic, the same way as Is it always greater to exist in
2+6=8 and that a triangle has reality? (a murderous
three sides, then God’s thought, pandemic, war)
existence is self evident as it Gaskin says moving from
is deductive definition to reality is a
Logical contradiction to ‘transitional error’
believe he doesn’t exist Can never be certain that
because if he didn’t exist then God’s exact definition is
anything that does exist is TTWNGCBC (Aquinas) so the
greater than God but God is premise is not 100% accurate,
TTWNGCBC therefore the conclusion is not
Is it fair to attack Anselm for accurate
, not proving God to the You can only go so far as to
unbeliever as he stated that say that if God exists then he
his work was ‘faith seeking exists necessarily
understanding’? If God is ‘wholly other’ we
cannot accept Anselm’s
definition of God or what he is
like. If he is ineffable then
Ayer would argue we are
talking nonsense if we try to
know what he is like
Russell- statements about
cannot be made unless we
know that God exists. The
‘present king of france is bald’
is not true or false if there is
no King of France’
GUANILO’S CRITICISM
Guanilo of Marmoutier
Benedictine monk
Contemporary of Anselm
Anselm’s argument is an exercise of wishful thinking, anything
can be though into existence with it
In his ‘In Behalf of the Fool’ he puts himself into the position of a
rational non-believer and puts forward the idea of the perfect
mythical Lost Island
If the perfect island doesn’t exist then it is a contradiction to
call it perfect, therefore it must exist
This applies to anything that we can think of that is ‘perfect’
by definition
Guanilo asks his readers to look at the empirical evidence of
the world which shows that these perfect things don’t exist
If parallel arguments from perfection are absurd, so is the
original ontological argument
THIS IS NOT COHERENT BECAUSE PLANTINGA SAYS THAT
ISLANDS HAVE NO INTRINSIC MAXIMUMS
ST ANSELM’S RESPONSE TO GUANILO
The OA only applies to God, a supremely necessary being.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller chitambarakarelina. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.20. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
