100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Essay 2 Legal Psychology $3.95   Add to cart

Essay

Essay 2 Legal Psychology

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Essay 2: biases in legal decision-making. Grade: 9.5

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • May 6, 2021
  • 4
  • 2020/2021
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • 9-10
avatar-seller
1


PSY3377 Legal Psychology

Assignment: Describe three biases that have been shown to influence legal decision making.


Assignment #: Second assignment

Word count: 772


Question

Describe three biases that have been shown to influence legal decision making.


Answer

In 2016 judge Aaron Persky sentenced a White Stanford undergraduate to six months for sexual
assault. A few weeks later, he sentenced a Mexican immigrant to three years for a similar crime
(Klausner, 2016; as cited in Wistrich & Rachlinski, 2017). Why did the judge make a
discrimination and are the decisions fair? From our judges we expect a fair decision that is free
from biases. Sometimes however, people might not be aware of a bias in their judgment. When
people are asked explicitly whether they think they have a bias, people tend to estimate that their
bias is low. However Implicit Association Tests show that people’s bias is generally higher than
they report when tested implicitly (Greenwald & Krieger, 2006). Biased decisions are more
likely to occur when the decision relies on one’s first instincts (intuition). It occurs rapid and
effortless with shallow cognitive processing. If judges rely on their intuition when making a
crucial decision, the decision might not be fair. Intuitive and emotional decisions can be erratic
and might not be relevant for the outcome of the case (Wistrich & Rachlinski, 2017). Biases can
thus play a role in legal decisions. In this essay I will identify and explain three biases that can
affect decision making in the courtroom.
The first bias that can affect the legal decision-making process is the ingroup-outgroup
bias. Sumner (1906; as cited in Forsyth, 2014) noted that humans are a specie that joins together
in groups. Another powerful tendency he identified, is the tendency to favor one’s own group.
On the other hand, there is derogation of the outgroup and feelings of contempt towards the

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ActUM. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.95. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77333 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.95
  • (0)
  Add to cart