Jones v dunkel - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Qld Bar Exam - Evidence Actual question with Rationale answers

Qld Bar Exam - Evidence Exam Questions And Answers Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof - ANS Evidential burden: BRING EVIDENCE. The burden of a party to bring evidence that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as the existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion must be able to prove it with evidence. Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to a the standard, or level of proof a party has an obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to BRD). Jud...

Qld Bar Exam - Evidence Questions And Answers Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof - Evidentiary burden: BRING EVIDENCE. The burden of a party to bring evidence that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as the existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion must be able to prove it with evidence. Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to the standard, or level of proof a party has an obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to BRD). Judge's Discret...

Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof - Answer-Evidentiary burden: BRING EVIDENCE. The burden of a party to bring evidence that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as the existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion must be able to prove it with evidence. Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to a the standard, or level of proof a party has an obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to BRD). Judge's Discretion - Answer-A judge has a discretion to e...

Queensland Bar - Cases Questions & Answers 2024 ( A+ GRADED 100% VERIFIED)

Jones v Dunkel Evidence (Civil) Adverse inferences may be drawn from the unexplained failure of a party to adduce particular evidence where such evidence would be reasonably expected to shed light on a matter. Case about man killed by a truck driven by D. D fails to appear as W. Corresponds to ss 9 (EAC doesnt affect CL) and 20 (failed to provide evidence) of tge EAC. Cases where judge can comment should be rare and exceptional - ie Weissensteiner Bale v Mills Ethics. Treatment of witness...