Garner v tennessee - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

MPOETC CERTIFICATION TEST/151 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (A+) 1st Amendment (1791) - √Answer :Freedom of speech, religion and press and the right to petition Quiz :2nd Amendment (1791) - √Answer :Right to bear arms Quiz :3rd Amendment (1791) - √Answer :The government may not house soldiers in private homes without consent of the owner Quiz :4th Amendment (1791) - √Answer :Freedom from unreasonable search and seizures Quiz :5th Amendment (1791) - √Answer :Double jeopardy, ...

Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Miranda vs. Arizona The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against selfincrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio Allowed the police to stop and se...

Miranda vs. Arizona - Answer- The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - Answer- Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - Answer- Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is...

CRIMINAL JUSTICE NOCTI EXAM REVIEW QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS LATEST VERSION 2023-2024|AGRADE Which U.S. supreme court case determined under what circumstances police could constitutionally use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing felon? - ANSWER-Tennessee v. Garner

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANS The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANS Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANS Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is c...

Chain of Custody The chronological paper trail showing the seizure, custody, control, transfer, analysis, and deposition of evidence is documented Contamination or alteration by responding medical personnel at a crime scene can be limited if an officer A. Moves the victims for better access B. Guides the medical personnel to the victims C. Administers all medical care themselves D. Makes sure the medical personnel clean up B. Guides the medical personnel to the victims After ...

2023 Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide(Post Exam)With Correct Answers!!

SCCJA cumulative Exam Questions with Answers | Latest 2023/2024 (Graded A+). When a person conforms to group norms because it appears that is what is expected it is called? - correct answers Group prejudice This is known as a popular "date rape" drug? - correct answers Rohypnol or Flunitrazepam - Also known as roofies. If you abuse a vulnerable adult, what is your max prison sentence for this felony? - correct answers 5 years What is the most frequently encountered illegal drug worldwide...

Katz v. United States Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resistance or flee Tennessee v. Garner Deadly force may ...

Katz v. United States Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resistance or flee Tennessee v. Garner Deadly force may ...