Garner v tennessee - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Katz v. United States - Answer Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - Answer exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - Answer determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resistance or flee ...

What type of searches and seizures does the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protect citizens from? CORRECT ANSWER *unreasonable The landmark 1985 United States Supreme Court case that established the "fleeing felon" rule is: CORRECT ANSWER *Tennessee v. Garner What is the rule of law known as the "fleeing felon" rule? CORRECT ANSWER *It is unreasonable to use deadly force to stop the non-violent fleeing felon. Is the police use of a roadblock to apprehend a susp...

Katz v. United States - CORRECT ANSWER-Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - CORRECT ANSWER-determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resis...

Katz v. United States - CORRECT ANSWER-Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - CORRECT ANSWER-determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resis...

2024 Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide(Post Exam) Answered 100% Correctly 2024 Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide(Post Exam) Answered 100% Correctly Katz v. United States Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather th...

2024 Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide Rated A+ Katz v. United States Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active r...

Katz v. United States - correct answer Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - correct answer exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - correct answer determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resi...

NOCTI Criminal Justice Test Questions and Answers 100% Correct 2024/2025 Latest Update What is the first step when treating a severe bleeding injury? A. Elevate injured area B. Press on the pressure point C. Apply a bandage D. Apply direct pressure - Answer- D. Apply direct pressure When handcuffing a suspect, activating a mechanism so that the handcuffs will not close further is known as ____ the handcuffs? A. Safety Locking B. Securing C. Double-Locking D. Stabilizing - Answer- C...

Louisiana POST Study Guide Latest Update Graded A Miranda vs. Arizona The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is c...

1.Terry v Ohio: police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him if they " may be armed and presently dangerous . " 2.Tennessee v . Garner: police officer may use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect only if the officer has belief that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others .