Affirming the consequent - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

CP- Final exam Review updated Questions and Answers 100% Already Graded A+ Excel Thinking - CORRECT ANSWER-requires you to go beyond the information you are given. Deductive reasoning - CORRECT ANSWER-given some specific premises, decide whether those premises allow you to draw a particular conclusion, based on the principles of logic. Ex- studying or research What are some factors of deductive reasoning? - CORRECT ANSWER--provides you with all the information you need to draw a conclus...

Saylor Academy - PHIL102 Final Study Questions with 100% Correct and Verified Answers Saylor Academy - PHIL102 Final Study Questions with 100% Correct and Verified Answers ad hominem - Answer a fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute ad ignorantiam - Answer an argument from lack of evidence Ex: Aliens don't exist because we have never seen one. Ad populum - Answer This fallacy occurs when evidence boils down to "ev...

PHIL 201 Final Exam Latest Verified Answers 2024. Argument - CORRECT ANSWER a reasoned presentation of information that includes a premise or premises and a conclusion... an inference based on evidence Soundness - CORRECT ANSWER an argument that is valid and has true premises Modus Ponens - CORRECT ANSWER A implies B. A. so, B Modus Tollens - CORRECT ANSWER A implies B. not B. so, not A Conjunction - CORRECT ANSWER A. B. so A & B Simplification - CORRECT ANSWER A & B. so A, o...

D265 Critical Thinking Study Exam Questions And Answers 100% Verified Critical Thinking - answerThe ability to think carefully about thinking and reasoning/to be critical of your own reasoning. Propositions - answerThe fundamental building blocks of arguments. They are a statement that can be true or false. Simple propositions - answerThey have no internal logic structure, they are simply true or false based on how the world is. Freedom should be the highest value for its citizens. - ans...

ETEC 171 Final Practice Exam Questions and Answers Statement or Nonstatement? I'm so jealous of Fred! -Answer-Statement Statement or Nonstatement? 2+2=5 -Answer-Statement Statement or Nonstatement? Would you like fries with that? -Answer-Nonstatement Statement or Nonstatement? God created the earth in six days. -Answer-Statement Statement or Nonstatement? I wouldn't ride with a hemlet if I were you. -Answer-Statement True or False? A person is guilty of practical inconsistency whe...

Differentiate between conditional reasoning and syllogism. Think of examples for each. conditional reasoning: type of deductive reasoning task that describes the relationship between conditions (if...then...) syllogism: type of deductive reasoning task that consists of two statements we must assume to be true, plus a conclusion (some, none, always) "If I study for my exam, then I will get a good grade." Which type of deductive reasoning is this? Identify the antecedent and the consequent. con...

D265 Readiness Quiz 1 Questions and Answers. D265 Readiness Quiz #1 Required 2 Which claim best represents strong critical thinking? Since I am always fair and objective, I know my view on the issue is correct. Let’s work together to clarify the problem and find a solution supported by the best available reasons and evidence. The problem is obvious and the answer is easy to see. The other candidate is a known cheat and liar. Even so, I look forward to having a substantive exchange of...

Deductive reasoning you begin with some specific premises that are true, and you need to judge whether those premises allow you to draw a particular conclusion, based on the principles of logic Conditional reasoning task (Propositional reasoning task) describes the relationship between conditions. Syllogism consists of two statements that we must assume to be true, plus a conclusion Propositional calculus is a system for categorizing the four kinds of reasoning used in analyzing propositions ...

Phil 347 Quiz 3 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers In conditional arguments if A then B A Therefore B is an example of: Valid form: Affirming the antecedent In conditional arguments, if A are B C is A therefore, C is B is an example of: Applying a generalization What are the two fallacies associated with deductive reasoning? Affirming the consequent and Denying the antecedent Which deductive reasonings are about relationships? Transitivity, reflexivity, and identity ...

Indexical - -words whose meaning is dependant on context Attributes of critical thinker - -Open minded Creative Analytical Affirming the consequent - -Fallacy, if x then y, y therefore x Denying the antecedant - -Fallacy if x then y, not x therefore not y Affirming a disjunct - -Fallacy XvY, X therefore ~Y Denying a conjuct - -Fallacy ~(X&Y) , ~X therefore Y broken chain - -fallacy if x then z, if y then z, x therefore y broken constructive dilema - -fallacy W->X,Y->Z,XvZ therefor...