Phi 103 quiz 4 - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

PHI 103 week 4 quiz Question 1 1 / 1 pts Which of the following is not true about inductive reasoning versus deductive reasoning? Question 2 0 / 1 pts Which of the following is not one of the advantages listed in the text of using inductive reasoning over deductive reasoning? Question 3 1 / 1 pts The following is one of the ways (listed in our text) to assess the quality of an inference to the best explanation:

PHI 103 Week 4 Quiz – Informal Logic Question 1 1 / 1 pts Using the hypothetico-deductive method how does one go about trying to test a hypothesis? Correct! One deduces a consequence from it and tests whether it occurs. One seeks tests that will verify its truth. One avoids situations in which the hypothesis might fail. One changes the hypothesis to fit the data. Question 2 1 / 1 pts This is a method by which one can strengthen an inductive argument. Adding false supporting premises Demonstrat...

1. Question : Identify the form of the following argument. If there is a universal standard for ethics, then there is an ultimate foundation for morality. If there is an ultimate foundation for morality, then humans can know the truth. Therefore, if there is a universal standard for ethics, then humans can know the truth. Student Answer: modus ponens disjunctive syllogism modus tollens not a valid form hypothetical syllogism Instructor Explanation: The answer can be found in Sec...

PHI 103 Week 5 Quiz Question 1 Spouse: “I know that you get angry a lot. I’m sure that pretty soon you will hit me or something. And what are we gonna do when we have kids? You will probably beat them until they run out of the house and I will be left childless and abused! Correct! Slippery Slope Begging the Question Red Herring No Fallacy Question 2 “If he were happy, he would be smiling. He is not smiling, so he is not happy.” Correct! Modus Tollens ...

PHI 103 Week 4 Quiz – Informal Logic Question 1 1 / 1 pts Using the hypothetico-deductive method how does one go about trying to test a hypothesis? Correct! One deduces a consequence from it and tests whether it occurs. One seeks tests that will verify its truth. One avoids situations in which the hypothesis might fail. One changes the hypothesis to fit the data. Question 2 1 / 1 pts This is a method by which one can strengthen an inductive argument. Adding false supporting premise...

Question 1 1 / 1 pts PHI 103 Week 2 Quiz Informal Logic (ACL1841B) Due October Points 20 Questions 20 Allowed Attempts 3 Instructions Attempt History Attempt Time Score LATEST Attempt 1 19 minutes 20 out of 20 Score for this attempt: 20 out of 20 2/10 Correct! Inference to the best explanation Statistical syllogism Inductive generalization Argument from analogy 96% of teenagers like rock and roll music Mike is a teenager So, Mike probably likes rock and roll music What type of ...

Question 1 1 / 1 pts PHI 103 Week 2 Quiz Informal Logic (ACL1841B) Due October Points 20 Questions 20 Allowed Attempts 3 Instructions Attempt History Attempt Time Score LATEST Attempt 1 19 minutes 20 out of 20 Score for this attempt: 20 out of 20 2/10 Correct! Inference to the best explanation Statistical syllogism Inductive generalization Argument from analogy 96% of teenagers like rock and roll music Mike is a teenager So, Mike probably likes rock and roll music What type of ...

PHI 103 thinking quiz A recent study of 100 employees from six departments of a major corporation found 65% to be sleep deprived. The researchers concluded that the majority of corporate employees are sleep deprived. The researcher’s conclusion is suspect because it Student Answer: assumes that corporate employees are more sleep deprived than other people is based on evidence that is statistically impossible fails to describe the effects the sleep deprivation has relies on a sam...

PHI 103 QUIZ 4 | RATED 100%PHI 103 QUIZ 4 Question 1 1 / 1 pts The following is one of the ways (listed in our text) to assess the quality of an inference to the best explanation: Is it indubitably true? Does it help us explain other phenomena as well? Is there proof of it? Does the result seem important? Question 2 1 / 1 pts This philosopher claimed that science should focus on falsifiability rather than confirmation. Karl Popper Friedrich Nietzsche Ludwig Wittgenstein Galileo Question 3 1 / 1 ...

ASHFORD – PHI 103 – WEEK 4 – QUIZ ANSWERS (PART 2) 1. Question : In the _________ argument, if the first event occurs, then another will follow, and it this happens, then another will follow, and this will be followed by progressively worse outcomes leading to a most undesirable end. This chain of conditional inferences is fallacious only if one or more of the chains is false or implausible, or if the indicated end is neither objectionable nor undesirable. Student Answer: appea...