Garner v tennessee - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Graham v. Connor (1989) Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to evade arrest by flight Additional factors considered...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed...

Chain of Custody - Answer-The chronological paper trail showing the seizure, custody, control, transfer, analysis, and deposition of evidence is documented Contamination or alteration by responding medical personnel at a crime scene can be limited if an officer A. Moves the victims for better access B. Guides the medical personnel to the victims C. Administers all medical care themselves D. Makes sure the medical personnel clean up - Answer-B. Guides the medical personnel to the victims ...

Graham v. Connor (1989) - ANSWER-Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - ANSWER-Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to evade arrest by flight Additi...

FLETC Written Exam #1 Study Guide. Graham v. Connor (1989) - answerRecognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - answerSeverity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to ...

Miranda vs. Arizona The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. ...

FLETC Written Exam #1 Review Questions and answers, VERIFIED/ Graham v. Connor (1989) - -Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - -Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting a...

FLETC Written Exam 1 With 100% Correct Answers 2024/2025 | Graded A+. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - Correct Answer-Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to evade arrest by flight Additional factors considered when applying standard of Graham v. Connor that may govern the reasonableness of using force - Correct...

100% Solved Weeks v. US (1914) Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experience; less than ...