Arson in the 2nd degree - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Katz v. United States - CORRECT ANSWER-Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - CORRECT ANSWER-determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resis...

Inchoate Offenses - Conspiracy Criminal Attempt Criminal Solicitation Culpable Mental States - Intentionally Knowingly Recklessly Negligence Willingly With Intent How many days do you have to report excessive use of force? What level crime is it if not reported? - 10 days and 1st degree misdemeanor What is PRICC? - Punishment Revenge Intimidation Coercion ControlWhat is 1st degree kidnapping? - Intentionally Must have concession to secure the release of the person(or give up anyt...

A person dresses up as a police officer to pretend he is a real cop and performs a traffic stop. During the traffic stop, he asks the person personal questions. What crime did this person commit? - AnswerCriminal Impersonation 1st Degree A person goes into someone's computer, sends themselves an email, and deletes all evidence. What crimes have been committed? - Answer-Computer Trespass, Theft, and Malicious Mischief. A person goes house to house pretending to be a representative of a busin...

Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide(Post Exam)With Correct Answers!! | Graded A+ Katz v. United States - ️️ -Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - ️️ -exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - ️️ -determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight....

BLEA 834 Criminal Law Final Review Latest Update Graded A A person dresses up as a police officer to pretend he is a real cop and performs a traffic stop. During the traffic stop, he asks the person personal questions. What crime did this person commit? Criminal Impersonation 1st Degree A person goes into someone's computer, sends themselves an email, and deletes all evidence. What crimes have been committed? Computer Trespass, Theft, and Malicious Mischief. A person goes house to house pret...

Act Bodily movement and includes words and possession of property Conduct Act or omission and its accompanying state of mind Criminal Negligence A gross deviation from the standard of care a reasonable person would exercise Culpable Mental State With intent or knowingly or willfully or recklessly or with criminal negligence Intentionally or with Intent When a person's conscious objective is to cause the specific result proscribed by the statute. It does not matt...

Katz v. United States - correct answer Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - correct answer exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - correct answer determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resi...

1000 feet - how far does a defendant found guilty of sex crimes have to live from a school or child care facility 2 degrees - how many degrees of sexual misconduct? 5 years of the commission of the offense - arson first degree, arson second degree, knowingly burning or exploding - how long to commence prosecution? 500 feet - how far must they stay away from school or child care facility? Presence or loitering within how many feet? 6 months of its commission - any infraction must be filed ...

Katz v. United States Correct Answer: Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio Correct Answer: exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor Correct Answer: determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active re...

Katz v. United States Correct Answer Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio Correct Answer exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor Correct Answer determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resistance o...