Class notes
Lecture 2 Chapter 10
- Course
- Institution
- Book
class and textbook notes
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Lecture 6 Chapter 11
-
Lecture 8 Chapter 12 an 13
-
Lecture 7 Chapter 10 and 11
Seller
Follow
JamieMongeon
Reviews received
Content preview
Lecture 2Evaluation of personality measures
● Reliability
● Validity
● Generalizability
Reliability: precision
● What makes a friend or car reliable?
● Reliability refers to the consistency or stability of a measure
● Types of reliability
○ Test-retest reliability: repeated measurement reliability, if test was
reliable, test scores would be the same since personality is not that
malleable from week to week
○ Inter-rater reliability: looks at agreement, correlate observations and
coding
○ Internal consistency reliability: individual items of personality
questionnaire asking questions about the same concept
Cronbach’s alpha: measure of internal consistency, that is, how closely related
a set of items are as a group. It is considered to be a measure of scale
reliability.
Validity
● Degree to which a test measures what it claims to measure
● Types of validity
○ Face validity
○ Predictive or criterion validity
○ Convergent validity
○ Discriminant validity
○ Construct validity
NOTES FROM FYSM 1310
Face validity (does it seem to be measuring/manipulating what it is supposed to be
measuring/manipulating?)
Content validity (does it cover the full breadth of the concept?)
Criterion validity (is it linked with predicted outcomes?)
Convergent validity (is it related to a gold standard, i.e. an established measure of the
construct)
Discriminant validity (does it have a 0 correlation with unrelated variables?)
Construct validity: the degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be
measuring.
Precision and accuracy
● Reliable but not valid: won’t use scale, not targeting what it is supposed to target
● Reliable and valid: will use
● Unreliable therefore not valid: random collection of questions, not even considered a
scale
, Generalizability
● Degree to which a measure retains validity across different context, including
different groups of people and different conditions
● Greater generalizability not always better; what is important is to identify empirical
contexts in which a measure is and is not applicable
● If it can be generalized, it is more useful, although not always favourable, sometimes
we want to be very specific with what we measure
Research designs and personality
● Experimental methods
○ Used to determine causality
○ Whether one variable causes another
○ 2 key requirements: manipulation of one or more variables and ensuring that
participants in each experimental condition are equivalent to each other at the
start of study
○ Randomly assign participants to groups
○ Ex. introversion-extraversion and positive affect study
○ Manipulate variable
○ When people come in a lab they have to have the same chance of being in
the experimental or control group
Do the results infer causality or correlation? (midterm question)
● Correlational studies
○ Correlational method: statistical procedure for determining whether there
is a relationship between two variables
○ Designed to identify “what goes with what” in nature
○ Major disadvantage: identify relationships among variables as they occur
naturally
○ Correlation coefficient varies from -1 (perfect negative relationship) through 0
(no relationship) to +1 (perfect positive relationship)
○ Correlation does not equal causation
● Case studies
○ In-depth examination of the life of one person
■ Interview of person and informants, naturalistic observation, archival
research, etc
■ Gordon allport
○ Advantages: personality in great detail, insights into personality to formulate a
general theory to test on a larger sample, in-depth knowledge about an
outstanding figure
○ Phineas Gage: Dr. John Martyn Harlow, effect of severe brain injury,
specifically the frontal lobe, on a person’s personality
■ Metal rod through brain, memory and intellect was in tact, although
personality was affected, reconstructed skull, discovered different
parts of brain
○ Disadvantage of case studies: results based on the study of a single person
cannot be generalized to others; for this reason, case studies often used as a
source of hypotheses and to illustrate principles in real life
FYSM 1310
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller JamieMongeon. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now