This set of notes helped me prepare for my Contract Law exam and achieved a 2.1 in my exam, graduating with a first class honours overall. This document sets out the key principles and cases to cite in your exams and can help you apply the law to practical problem questions.
LL104 Contract Law - Cheat Sheet covering All Units, Lectures, and Reading (First)
Summary - Duress (LL104 - Contract Law)
Summary - Remedies (LL104 - Contract Law)
All for this textbook (8)
Written for
London School of Economics (LSE)
London School of Economics
Contract Law
All documents for this subject (12)
Seller
Follow
sumansachdev
Content preview
Notes on Misrepresentation
Promise- An undertaking to do/not do something creating an expectation protected by law
Representation- asserts existence of a given state of affairs, either true or false. Invites reliance without
constituting an undertaking to bring about that state of affairs
1. Is it a contractual promise?
a. If the statement is a contractual term i.e. the defendant promised that a certain state of affairs
existed or would exist (rather than merely asserted the truth of them), then claim for breach of
contract, not misrepresentation!
b. Preferable because:
i. Claimant will obtain expectation measure of damages (place the claimant in the position as
if the promise had been fulfilled) rather than reliance measure.
ii. No need to establish culpability of defendant, or the requirements of a misrepresentation
2. Representation?
a. Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp [1989] – Claimant agreed to loan money to
defendant’s subsidiary company based on the representation that it is their policy to ensure the
subsidiary company is able to repay their debt. Subsidiary business collapsed when it had a £10
million debt.
i. Letter of comfort was a representation of their current policy and not a contractual promise
as to their future policy.
3. TWO main requirements for misrepresentation
a. Representation that is false
i. ‘Unambiguous false statement of existing fact or law’
1. Failure to disclose does not generally constitute a representation and silence is
usually insufficient (With v O’Flannagan)
2. If statement was true to begin with but false due to a change in circumstances by
the time it was acted upon, failure to disclose the change in circumstances is a
misrepresentation. With v O’Flannagan – Failure to disclose information on change
of medical practise’s income following the vendor’s illness was misrepresentation.
3. Statements of half-truth can be misrepresentation. Dimmock v Hallett – Statement
that farms on the land was tenanted but failure to inform the tenants had given
notice to quit was misrepresentation.
4. Conduct can sometimes constitute misrepresentation. Gordon v Selico Co Ltd –
covering up patches of dry rot so they are not seen upon inspection of flat.
5. Courts are flexible sometimes in defining a statement as it can be made by conduct
sometimes.
, ii. Misrepresentation of law will suffice (Brennan v Bolt Burden)
iii. NOT sufficient:
1. ‘Mere puff’ – statements that are too vague. The more specific, the less likely to be a
mere puff (Carbolic Smoke Ball Co, specific representation that payment will be
made and money was kept aside to show sincerity)
a. Contrast to Dimmock v Hallett, representation that land was ‘fertile and
improvable was not a misrepresentation.
2. Statements of opinion
a. Like in Bisset v Wilkinson, vendor said the land would carry 2000 sheep in his
judgement but this was an opinion honestly held.
b. Where facts are known to both parties What one says to another is often
a mere expression of opinion
c. UNLESS the representor has greater knowledge than the representee, courts
will then imply duty to make representations with reasonable skill and care
and it will be assumed representor impliedly states he knows facts that
justifies his opinion.
d. Esso v Mardon – such duty to make representation with reasonable care and
skill. Due to Esso’s representation that petrol station constructed in a less
busy spot would not affect throughput of petrol meant defendant incurred
losses and couldn’t pay Esso for petrol. Negligent misrepresentation found.
i. Bisset distinguished as farm had not ever been used for sheep
farming and both parties were equally able to form an opinion
whereas Esso had special knowledge in predicting throughput of
petrol.
3. Statements of intent (Wales v Wadham)
a. Statement of intent as to what D will do in the future is not a
misrepresentation
b. BUT false statement of present intent is misrepresentation
c. Edgington v Fitzmaurice – Directors raised money through stating it is for
expanding the business but was collected with the intention to pay off
existing liabilities.
b. Addressed to the misled party
i. Through direct communication
ii. Through communication through a third party with the intent to be passed on to claimant
(Commercial Banking Co v RH Brown)
c. Induced claimant to enter the contract
i. Misrepresentation played a ‘real and substantial’ part in inducing the claimant to contract
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sumansachdev. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.84. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
