100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Criminal Procedure GPSTC 320-321 Exam Questions and Answers $13.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Criminal Procedure GPSTC 320-321 Exam Questions and Answers

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • GPSTC
  • Institution
  • GPSTC

Criminal Procedure GPSTC 320-321 Exam Questions and Answers

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

  • November 11, 2024
  • 17
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • GPSTC
  • GPSTC
avatar-seller
millyphilip
Criminal Procedure GPSTC 320/321
Exam Questions and Answers

probable cause - Answers -*facts or circumstances* that would make a reasonable or
prudent *person* believe a crime is being or has been committed.

Probable cause to search v probably cause to arrest - Answers -Two types of probable
cause

An arrest without probable cause is - Answers -illegal

PC is the basis for - Answers -a *legal* search or a *legal* arrest

The Exclusionary Rule definition - Answers -A rule that provides that otherwise
admissible evidence cannot be used in a criminal trial if it was the result of illegal police
conduct
ex: illegally searching someone and finding contraband does not allow that evidence to
be used in court

Evidence seized in violation of due process or some provision of ___________ (based
on exclusionary rule) - Answers -the Bill of Rights

Weeks v. US - Answers -Case law that established exclusionary rule, evidence gotten
without a warrant isn't admissible in a *federal court*

Lottery tickets were seized from a home without a SW

Wolfe v. Colorado (1949) - Answers -FEDS would go to *local* officers and make them
obtain evidence because the exclusionary rule did not apply to local and state officers
also known as *Silver Platter Doctrine* - was ultimately struck down

Mapp v. Ohio (1961) - Answers -Extended the Exclusionary Rule to the states,
increasing the protections for defendants.
Illegally obtained evidence could not be used in state, county, and local govt
Searched Mapp's house with a fake SW for gambling stuff but she had porn (obscene
materials) in her house

Purpose of Exclusionary Rule - Answers -to deter police misconduct;

to control the behavior of the cops

,Government Action - Answers -Any action taken by government officials and their
agents (the po-po)

Exclusionary Rule _________ - Answers -only applies to government action

The Exclusionary Rule prohibits the following: - Answers -1. The introduction of
evidence seized during an unlawful search
2. Testimony concerning knowledge acquired from that unlawful search
3. Derivative evidence that flowed from the unlawful search

The **sole** purpose of the exclusionary rule is : - Answers -to operate as a deterrent to
unlawful conduct by the police

Exclusionary Rule Exceptions - Answers -good faith
inevitable discovery
purged taint
independent source

The Good Faith Exception : - Answers -An exception to the exclusionary rule, holding
that evidence seized on the basis of a mistakenly issued search warrant can be
introduced at trial if the mistake was made in good faith, that is, if all the parties involved
had reason at the time to believe that the warrant was proper.
*not applicable in GA*

independent source exception - Answers -the essential aspect is the existence of
evidence which was not illegally seized and which in fact provided an independent basis
for the discovery of the challenged evidence

inevitable discovery exception - Answers -improperly obtained evidence can be used
when it would later have inevitably been discovered without improper actions by the
police

Purged Taint Exception - Answers -If the evidence that is to be introduced is so far
removed from the wrong done by the cops then it may be admissible.
(attenuation)

US v. Leon (1984) - Answers -Created the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule
The cops did nothing wrong, therefore, the evidence got to stay

Gary v. State (1992) - Answers -The states have the power to impose higher standards
on searches and seizures than required by the Federal Constitution if it chooses to do
so,
and GA has a statute that restricts govt action (bc no good faith exception here)

Motion to Suppress - Answers -A request that the court prohibit the use of certain
evidence at the trial.

, 1. the search and seizure was illegal
2. the search and seizure with a warrant was illegal because the warrant is insufficient
on its face, there was not probable cause for the issuance of the warrant, or the warrant
was illegally executed

Burden of Proof is on - Answers -the state

Independent Source Example - Answers -the source of evidence must be independent
of the initial illegal action taken place.
ex: prints from illegal arrest thrown out, but prints from a prior legal arrest can be used

inevitable discovery example - Answers -impossible to avoid or prevent ; an
unavoidable event
- requires only that the evidence hypothetically would have been seized through some
legal means
must be actively pursuing means of discovery
ex: *Christian Burial Case*

Brewer v. Williams (1977) - Answers -Called the Christian Burial Speech
*inevitable discovery*

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine - Answers -A legal principle that excludes from
introduction at trial any evidence later developed as a result of an illegal search or
seizure.

the prosecution must show on inevitable discovery: - Answers -11th circuit standard
1. the lawful means which made the discovery inevitable, were possessed by the police,
and
2. were actively being pursued prior to the occurrence of the illegal conduct

attenuate - Answers -to reduce in force or degree; to weaken

Wong Sun v. US - Answers -In the view of the fact that after his unlawful arrest,
petitioner Wong Sun had been lawfully arraigned and released on his own recognizance
and had returned *voluntarily, several days later when he made his unsigned statement*
the connection between his unlawful arrest and the making of that statement was so
attenuated that the unsigned statement was not the fruit of the unlawful arrest and,
therefore, it was properly admitted evidence
(*purged taint*)

Oregon v. Elstad (1985) - Answers -Facts: Michael Elstad arrested for burglary,
incriminated self/confessed before read Miranda rights
*purged taint due to the separation of time and the recognition of his rights after the
fact*
if miranda read after the fact and free and voluntary statement given, it is admissible

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller millyphilip. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $13.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76799 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$13.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart