Exam (elaborations)
CMN3105 Media Ethics Guide With Complete Solution
- Course
- Institution
CMN3105 Media Ethics Guide With Complete Solution...
[Show more]
Content preview
CMN3105 Media Ethics Guide WithComplete Solution
The outcome to Her Majesty the Queen vs. Canadian Newspapers Company
Limited - ANSWER Measures which prohibit media from public information
deemed of interest restricts freedom of expression (s. 2(b) of the charter).
But the code is justifiable under s. 1 of the charter and applicable only to
sexual assault cases when the complainant or prosecutor request the order.
(minimal impairement). Media are always allowed in court (no infringement
on right to a public hearing) and a mandatory publicition ban is only used to
keep information that might reveal the victims' identity away from public
scrutiny to remedy the underreporting of sexual assault cases
- Appeal was allowed
The outcome of the Her Majesty The Queen vs David Edwin Oakes case -
ANSWER The possession of a small or negligable quantity of narcotics would
not support the inference of trafficking, appeal was dismissed
Section 8 of the Narcotic Control Act - ANSWER Requires the accused to
prove he is not guilty of trafficking once the basic fact of possession is
proven
Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - ANSWER
Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure
The outcome of the MacIntyre case - ANSWER The public as well as those
who are directly interested have a right to inspect the warrant and the
related information, appeal was dismissed on the grounds of the open court
,principle
Core concept of the MacIntyre case - ANSWER The open court principle
Section 2 (b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - ANSWER
freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the
press and other media of communication
Section 11 (d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - ANSWER
One has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to
law in fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal
Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - ANSWER
Guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it, subject only to such
reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
and democratic society
2 competing interests of the MacIntyre case - ANSWER - individual's right to
privacy, civil right to property
- societal concern for the proper and effective administration of justice (with
respect to the state to conduct an ethical search without infringing on one's
property)
3 key factors conducive to an effective search warrant - ANSWER - timing
- element of surprise
- confidentiality
What notion is grounded in s. 11 (d) of the Charter of Right and Freedoms? -
ANSWER Publicity
- makes a situation visible and susceptible to scrutiny
, - has a way to keep people accountable
- to be presumed innocent is important in preserving one's dignity and
reputation
Aspects of the conceptualization of a law - ANSWER - policy is underpinned
by ethics, is an articulation of the law, is an embodiment of competing
visions and brings the "ought" factor
- a bill is the embodiment of a process, a conception of policy debates
Three importants elements of s. 1 of the Charter - ANSWER Criteria that the
state has to follow in order to be able to infringe on one's rights or freedoms
- reasonable
- prescribed by law
- demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society
Implementation of the will of Parliament - ANSWER comes in the form of
laws and statutes
The rights and freedoms in Canada are... - ANSWER not absolute but
qualified
Dissenting - ANSWER the argument opposing that of the final judgement
The Respondent in the Her Majesty The Queen vs David Edwin Oakes case -
ANSWER David Edwin Oakes
The Oakes test - ANSWER the mechanism by which the state can save a piece
of legislation that has been determined to infringe an individual's freedoms
- in place to give the state the opportunity to save the impugned (impugn: to
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Smooth. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75057 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now