100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Project I Compliance ReportSouthern New Hampshire UniversityEthics in the Workplace Synops $7.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Project I Compliance ReportSouthern New Hampshire UniversityEthics in the Workplace Synops

 2 views  0 purchase

BUSINESS 696-X5437 Project IProject I Compliance ReportSouthern New Hampshire UniversityEthics in the Workplace Synopsis: This compliance report, dated April 7th , 2024, is to address a complaint in which has been filed implicating the manager involved (whom is CPA certified) with manipulating resu...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • October 6, 2024
  • 6
  • 2024/2025
  • Summary
  • dated april 7th
  • 2024
All documents for this subject (144)
avatar-seller
newage
Project I




Compliance Report

Southern New Hampshire University




Ethics in the Workplace Synopsis: This compliance report, dated April 7th , 2024, is to

address a complaint in which has been filed implicating the manager involved (whom is CPA

certified) with manipulating results to overstate net income. This report will discuss the

ethical standards in which were not followed by the manager. Any violations that took place,

the repercussion for said violations and lastly any recommendations for the leadership team

in order to prevent this from happening again in the near future will also be discussed in this

report. Compliance Report: While researching this complaint, there were several violations in

which took place. To begin, we must discuss the accounting frameworks in which apply to

these reporting situations. In this particular case, the US GAAP (Generally Accepted

Accounting Principles) is where the violations begin. There was an overall violation with the

financial statement presentation. The violation here is that the manager involved (a CPA

certified manager) overstated net income by manipulating certain data items. Beginning with

the assets issue, the manager took it upon themselves to move certain expenses to prepaid

assets. Not all expenses can be deemed as prepaid assets. Only prepaid expenses can be

classified as an asset due to the "results from a business making advance payments for goods

, or services to be received in the future". With the changes that took place, there are no

indications on whether some of the expenses are due to prepaid expenses which may or may

be classified as an asset. As we are aware, with the improper classification's, assets may or

may not equal to liabilities and shareholders equity. Due to this, assets may be considered

overstated, and liabilities understated. This will cause misrepresentations as states will not

show the proper financial situation and/or potential a business may have. Next, we have the

issue of changing the depreciation method. Per ASC 250-Ruiz, 2

Ethics in the Workplace10-45-18 it states "that a change in method of depreciation is

considered a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle.

"The new depreciation method is adopted in partial or complete recognition of a change in

the estimated future benefits inherent in the asset, the pattern of consumption of those

benefits, or the information available to the reporting entity about those benefits." In such

circumstances, the effect of the change in accounting principle, or the method of applying it,

is considered inseparable from the effect of the change in accounting estimate." Then lastly,

we have the issue surrounding deferred revenue where the manager changed this to standard

revenue. The difference between the two is quite simple. Deferred revenue is basically a

prepayment or advanced payment of services or goods in which will be delivered or

performed at later time in the future. Standard revenue on the other is simply when services

or goods are delivered or perform at the moment there is a monetary exchange. By the

manager classifying deferred revenue as standard revenue, the income statement then

becomes overstated simply because a percentage of net income has not yet been earned in

accordance with revenue recognition according to US GAAP. This leads into situations

regarding integrity, transparency and accountability. Beginning with integrity, we must

remember that in the accounting profession "integrity refers to the uncompromising

adherence to moral and ethical principles. Accountants with integrity maintain truthfulness in

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller newage. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart