100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
AP U.S. Gov Landmark Supreme Court Cases questions with answers. $9.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

AP U.S. Gov Landmark Supreme Court Cases questions with answers.

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Government course
  • Institution
  • Government Course

AP U.S. Gov Landmark Supreme Court Cases questions with answers.

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • October 5, 2024
  • 6
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Government course
  • Government course
avatar-seller
Professorkaylee
AP U.S. Gov Landmark Supreme Court
Cases questions with answers.

Marbury v. Madison (1803) ANS -Established the power of judicial review in finding that a congressional
statute extending the Court's original jurisdiction was unconstitutional (Marshall Court)



McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) ANS -Allowed Congress to establish a national bank via implied powers
from the "necessary and proper clause" and stopped Maryland from taxing the national bank as
violation of Supremacy Clause (Marshall Court)



Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) ANS -Ferry boat case; only Congress is granted the power to regulate interstate
commerce by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution (Marshall Court)



Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) ANS -Ruled slaves were not citizens under the Constitution; struck down
Missouri Compromise (Taney Court)



Reynolds v. United States (1879) ANS -Upheld federal ban on polygamy because it is not protected by
the free exercise clause; government can punish criminal activity without regard to religious belief
(Waite Court)



Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) ANS -Upheld state-imposed racial segregation; "separate but equal" doctrine
(Fuller Court)



Schenck v. United States (1919) ANS -Upheld the Espionage Act; declared that 1st Amendment right to
freedom of speech was not absolute; free speech could be limited if its exercise presented a "clear and
present danger" (White Court)



Gitlow v. New York (1925) ANS -Court recognized some limits on free speech, and established the
selective incorporation of the Bill of rights (a.k.a. incorporation doctrine) through the 14th amendment;
Bill of Rights can limit the states as well as the federal government (Taft Court)

, West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnett (1943) ANS -Ruled public school children (Jehovah's
witnesses) cannot be compelled to salute the flag or recite the Pledge; violates 1st Amendment freedom
of speech (Stone Court)



Korematsu v. United States (1944) ANS -Upheld the U.S. government's decision to put Japanese-
Americans in internment camps during World War II due to a clear and present danger (Stone Court)



Brown v. Board of Education I (1954) ANS -Racial discrimination in public schools is unconstitutional;
segregation psychologically damaging to black children; overturned "separate but equal" because it
violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment (Warren Court)



Mapp v. Ohio (1961) ANS -Established the exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used
in court (Warren Court)



Baker v. Carr (1962) ANS -Opened the door to equal protection challenges to redistricting and the
development of the "one person, one vote" doctrine by ruling that challenges to redistricting did not
raise "political questions" that would keep federal courts from reviewing such challenges

(Warren Court)



Engel v. Vitale (1962) ANS -Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools by virtue of
1st Amendment's establishment clause and the 14th Amendment's due process clause (Warren Court)



Abington School District v. Schempp (1963) ANS -Prohibited school-sponsored devotional Bible reading
in public schools because it violated the establishment clause and due process clause (Warren Court)



Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) ANS -Extended to the defendant the right of counsel in all state and federal
criminal trials regardless of their ability to pay (Warren Court)



Wesberry v. Sanders (1963) ANS -Established "one man, one vote;" ordered House districts to be as near
equal in population as possible during reapportionment process (Warren Court)



Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964) ANS -Upheld the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Congress can
ban segregation in public accommodations via the commerce clause (Warren Court)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Professorkaylee. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75057 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart