100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
ENGR 482 Exam 3 Guide With Complete Solution $10.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

ENGR 482 Exam 3 Guide With Complete Solution

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • ENGR 482
  • Institution
  • ENGR 482

ENGR 482 Exam 3 Guide With Complete Solution...

Preview 3 out of 22  pages

  • October 2, 2024
  • 22
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • engr 482 exam 3 guide
  • ENGR 482
  • ENGR 482
avatar-seller
Belina
ENGR 482 Exam 3 Guide With
Complete Solution

T/F: According to the "Common Sense View," technological artifacts take on
moral properties when used for good or evil by humans. - ANSWER False-
this view is that artifacts have no moral properties in themselves.

T/F: The difference b/w the "Common Sense" and "Strong" views toward the
morality of technological artifacts is a matter of the degree to which people
blame artifacts for immoral actions. - ANSWER False- there is a fundamental
difference b/w the views regarding whether artifacts can be held morally
responsible for certain actions.

Why are Robert Moses' architectural designs indicative of Langdon Winner's
view of the moral properties of artifacts (the "Strong View")? - ANSWER
Moral values are built into his designs, which come to embody these values.

T/F: Bruno Latour, reflecting the "Strong View" toward technological
artifacts, believed artifacts are morally considerable because they work as
actants alongside human beings in a responsible network. - ANSWER True

What does Martin Heidegger say often happens w/ tools as they are used? -
ANSWER -They become invisible b/c the user's focus is on the task at hand

-They are noticed when they don't function as designed

What is meant by Don Ihde's term "multi-usability"? - ANSWER An artifact
can be used in different ways based on each user's intentions.

Bruno Latour's "script" of a thing - ANSWER The behaviors that the artifact

,invites or inhibits its user to perform

Don Ihde's "technological intentionality" - ANSWER Technology "shades"
how we see the world, emphasizing some things at the expense of others.

Technological Optimist - ANSWER "on the whole, technology is for the
better"

Technological Pessimist - ANSWER "on the whole, technology is for the
worst"

Technological Determinism - ANSWER Technology precedes its own logic; we
can't do anything to stop its progress

Critical Approach to Technology - ANSWER A check on the Enlightenment
spirit; analogous to the food critic

Artifact - ANSWER Any object intentionally created by humans

Common Sense View - ANSWER -Can't blame the artifact for a wrongdoing

-Humans made objects as mere tools/neutral means to an end

-Objects have no moral properties

-We ascribe right or wrong (good or bad) to humans and their actions

Strong View (Latour) - ANSWER -"morality is inside the things"; artifacts DO
have moral properties

-Actor-Network Theory (ANT)

-Attributes moral relevance to artifacts whose existence perpetuates moral
values

-Believe some combo of subject and object should be though of as one and

, the same entity

Actor-Network Theory (ANT) - ANSWER -Objects serve as "actors" or
"actants"

-Not possible to uphold the boundary b/w humans and artifacts

Strong View (Winner) - ANSWER -Objects "embody a systematic social
inequality" that becomes "part of the social landscape"

-Example of Robert Moses' designs

-Therefore, artifacts embody morality

Strong View (Verbeek) - ANSWER -"Moral agency is distributed over both
humans and technological artifacts"

-Humans and artifacts don't have separate existence anymore

-Many artifacts blur this distinction from subject

-Moral agencies should be ascribed to hybrid entities of both subjects and
objects

Moderate View - ANSWER -Technological artifacts can't be part of a moral
agent/subject and can't be responsible

-However, artifacts have high moral relevance in ethics b/c they create new
options for action

-Artifacts have moral relevance, but aren't morally responsible or
accountable for their effects

Mediating Technology - ANSWER Mediate experiences b/w object and
subject

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Belina. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79223 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart