State V. Perkins
"Fighting Words" not protected. Officers need to have a thicker skin!
Houston V. Hill
Cannot interfere with Police Officer's duties.
Previous
Play
Next
Rewind 10 seconds
Move forward 10 seconds
Unmute
--
/
--
Full screen
Brainpower
Read More
State V. B...
SCCJA Unit 2 Court Cases
with complete solutions
State V. Perkins - answer "Fighting Words" not protected. Officers
need to have a thicker skin!
Houston V. Hill - answer Cannot interfere with Police Officer's duties.
State V. Bailey - answer People can curse at Police but cannot be
loud and boisterous in a public place.
City of Bismark V. Nassif - answer A Threat is something that can be
reasonably acted upon. Defendant was arrested for DC.
State V. Messervy - answer Security Officers can prosecute
misdemeanor cases in summary court that occurred within the
boundaries they patrol.
State V. Sossamon - answer Officer's must prosecute their own
cases. They cannot pass off the cases to officer's that are better at
present a case.
City of Easley V. Cartee - answer License security officers have been
granted by legislation the authority and power of sheriffs to arrest
any person violating the criminal statutes of the state.
Katz V. US - answer Get a warrant if you want to search legally. Also
defendant has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
, Riley V. California; US V. Wurie - answer Need search warrant to
search cell phones.
State V. Peters - answer Exceptions to the warrant requirement,
Search incident to arrest, Hot Pursuit, Stop & Frisk, Automobile
Exception, Plain View Doctrine and Consent.
US V. Fisher - answer If officer lies on Affidavit and the case is based
on that false PC. The defendants Due Process was violated.
State V. McKnight - answer Sworn Oral testimony is not enough,
Must have a written Affidavit.
Johnson V. US - answer Determination of PC must be made by a
Neutral, Detached Magistrate.
Maryland V. Garrison - answer If a search warrant is obtained and
describes a specific area and upon arrival that area is unknowingly
split up into two areas. The evidence found within the second area
does not require suppression.
Richards V. Wisconsin - answer When officers originally requested a
"No knock" warrant, but the Judge issues a "Knock and Announce"
warrant. The officers on scene can still make a judgement call and
still use a "No Knock" approach.
US V. Ramirez - answer With Search warrant in hand, the officers
can use Trickery or Deception to gain entrance into the residence.
"Pizza delivery"!
State V. Valentine - answer The suspect right to privacy is minimal
when police have the warrant and they have no right to refuse entry
to police, only a right to submit voluntarily.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller BRAINBOOSTERS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $13.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
