100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Queensland Bar Exam - Evidence (QLB) () Questions With 100% Correct Answers!! $12.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Queensland Bar Exam - Evidence (QLB) () Questions With 100% Correct Answers!!

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Queensland Bar
  • Institution
  • Queensland Bar

Queensland Bar Exam - Evidence (QLB) () Questions With 100% Correct Answers!!

Preview 3 out of 29  pages

  • August 11, 2024
  • 29
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Queensland Bar
  • Queensland Bar
avatar-seller
TIPSCORE
Qld Bar Exam - Evidence.pdf file:///C:/Users/HP/Desktop/TYPA%20NEW/Qld%20Bar%20Exam




Qld Bar Exam - Evidence


1. Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof: Evidentiary burden: BRING

EVIDENCE.The burden of a party to bring evidence that there is sufficient evidence to

raise an issue as the existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion

must be able to prove it with evidence.


Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to a the standard, or level of proof a party has an

obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to BRD).

2. Judge's Discretion: A judge has a discretion to exclude evidence (eg. a con-

fession) on the ground that it is highly prejudicial and not probative (reliable) or for

public policy reasons (eg. evidence illegally obtained): Bunning v Cross (1978); s130

Evidence Act 1977 (Qld); ss135-139 EA; R v Christie.

3. Browne v Dunn: Rule: Unless notice has been given, Counsel that wishes to

contradict a witness by calling other evidence must put that evidence to the witness

for their comment.


Rationale: Anti-ambush rule for fairness. Allows other party to call evidence so they can

explain it.





1 of 29 8/8/2024, 3:31

,Qld Bar Exam - Evidence.pdf file:///C:/Users/HP/Desktop/TYPA%20NEW/Qld%20Bar%20Exam




Court can then enjoy joinder evidence/FII.


Consequences of non-compliance:

Ethical and evidentiary implications; can be given less weight, denial of right to

respond by party/witness, other party may be entitled recall evidence/put rebuttal

evidence. Potential mistrial, appeal or jury warning given.


Provide an example.

4. Jones v Dunkel [1959]: Rule: In certain circumstances, a party that provides an

unexplained failure to provide evidence may lead to an inference that the uncalled

evidence would not have assisted the party's case.


Rationale: Deterrence against parties tempted to withhold evidence; promotes fair-

ness, discourages parties from hiding or suppressing evidence that could weaken their

position, and promotes transparency.


Provide example.

5. When does Jones v Dunkel not apply?: Limited application in criminal proceed-

ings, can be used against Crown.


Also does not apply in the appropriate circumstances: 1) when the party is 'required







2 of 29 8/8/2024, 3:31

,Qld Bar Exam - Evidence.pdf file:///C:/Users/HP/Desktop/TYPA%20NEW/Qld%20Bar%20Exam




to explain or contradict something' and 2) it is within their power to tender it, and 3)

there is no adequate explanation as to failure.

6. Bunning v Cross [1978]: Rule: Evidence that was obtained unlawfully/improperly

must not be admitted unless the importance/probative value > factors (public inter-

est, unfairness and prejudice). Codified in s138 CEA. Factors are: deliberateness of the

conduct, probative value of the evidence, ease with which compliance with law might

have been achieved, nature of the offence charged, purpose of the legislative

restrictions.


Rationale: Striking a balance between enforcing public interest with fair policing/dis-

closure against exclusion of evidence otherwise not manifestly unfair/prejudicial (eg

niche technical points). Operative deterrence against bad policing and reliance on

exclusionary rules of evidence.

7. Exclusion of Relevant Evidence: 1) R v Christie: prejudicial value > probative

value.

2) Unfairness in s 130 EAQ/s 135 EAC. Provide

example of each.

8. Admissibility of expert evidence: 7 conditions, also in s 79 EAC.

1) Expert opinion is in field of specialised knowledge.






3 of 29 8/8/2024, 3:31

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TIPSCORE. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $12.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79223 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$12.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart