100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Exam MFE/3F Sample Questions and Solutions $21.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Exam MFE/3F Sample Questions and Solutions

 15 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • MFE/3F
  • Institution
  • MFE/3F

. Consider a European call option and a European put option on a nondividend-paying stock. You are given: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) The current price of the stock is 60. The call option currently sells for 0.15 more than the put option. Both the call option and put option will expire in...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 185  pages

  • August 3, 2024
  • 185
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • MFE/3F
  • MFE/3F
avatar-seller
TIFFACADEMICS
Exam MFE/3F
Sample Questions and Solutions
#1 to #76




In this version, standard normal distribution values are obtained by using the
Cumulative Normal Distribution Calculator and Inverse CDF Calculator provided in
http://www.prometric.com/SOA/MFE3F_calculator.htm




1 April 8, 2011

,1. Consider a European call option and a European put option on a nondividend-paying
stock. You are given:


(i) The current price of the stock is 60.
(ii) The call option currently sells for 0.15 more than the put option.
(iii) Both the call option and put option will expire in 4 years.
(iv) Both the call option and put option have a strike price of 70.


Calculate the continuously compounded risk-free interest rate.


(A) 0.039
(B) 0.049
(C) 0.059
(D) 0.069
(E) 0.079




2 April 8, 2011

,Solution to (1) Answer: (A)

The put-call parity formula (for a European call and a European put on a stock with the
same strike price and maturity date) is
C  P  F0,PT ( S )  F0,PT ( K )

 F0,PT ( S )  PV0,T (K)

 F0,PT ( S )  KerT

= S0  KerT,
because the stock pays no dividends



We are given that C  P  0.15, S0  60, K  70 and T  4. Then, r  0.039.



Remark 1: If the stock pays n dividends of fixed amounts D1, D2,…, Dn at fixed times t1,
t2,…, tn prior to the option maturity date, T, then the put-call parity formula for European
put and call options is
C  P  F0,PT ( S )  KerT
 S0  PV0,T(Div)  KerT,
where PV0,T(Div)   Di e i is the present value of all dividends up to time T. The
 rt
n


i 1

difference, S0  PV0,T(Div), is the prepaid forward price F0P,T ( S ) .


Remark 2: The put-call parity formula above does not hold for American put and call
options. For the American case, the parity relationship becomes

S0  PV0,T(Div)  K ≤ C  P ≤ S0  KerT.

This result is given in Appendix 9A of McDonald (2006) but is not required for Exam
MFE/3F. Nevertheless, you may want to try proving the inequalities as follows:
For the first inequality, consider a portfolio consisting of a European call plus an amount
of cash equal to PV0,T(Div) + K.
For the second inequality, consider a portfolio of an American put option plus one share
of the stock.




3 April 8, 2011

, 2. Near market closing time on a given day, you lose access to stock prices, but some
European call and put prices for a stock are available as follows:


Strike Price Call Price Put Price
$40 $11 $3
$50 $6 $8
$55 $3 $11

All six options have the same expiration date.

After reviewing the information above, John tells Mary and Peter that no arbitrage
opportunities can arise from these prices.

Mary disagrees with John. She argues that one could use the following portfolio to
obtain arbitrage profit: Long one call option with strike price 40; short three call
options with strike price 50; lend $1; and long some calls with strike price 55.

Peter also disagrees with John. He claims that the following portfolio, which is
different from Mary’s, can produce arbitrage profit: Long 2 calls and short 2 puts
with strike price 55; long 1 call and short 1 put with strike price 40; lend $2; and
short some calls and long the same number of puts with strike price 50.

Which of the following statements is true?


(A) Only John is correct.

(B) Only Mary is correct.

(C) Only Peter is correct.

(D) Both Mary and Peter are correct.

(E) None of them is correct.




4 April 8, 2011

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TIFFACADEMICS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $21.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$21.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart