Essay valuation of company + critique of CAPM (spreadsheet+essay)
12 views 1 purchase
Course
Corporate Financial Management (5K6Z0046_2223_9)
Institution
Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU)
Two part essay. Part one was creating a valuation for the company Burberry in excel using the the discounted cash flow method, the sheet contains all the formulas and references to values. Part two was a justification for the values used. I used multiple valuation firms (yahoo finance, fidelity, mo...
1. You will comment briefly on the valuation you have produced (using the valuation
model) and compare your valuation figure with any other current valuation figure
available (2 marks),
and;
2. You will be expected to fully justify the estimates used in your model regarding the
following key elements;
• The horizon period chosen (8 marks)
• The difference (spread) between ROIC and the Cost of Capital both during and
after the horizon period (5 marks)
• The expected future growth both during and after the horizon period (5 marks)
Justification should be provided with reference to a combination of theoretical
literature, company, and industry specific factors. It is vital that justification
comes from a combination of these sources.
, Section A
The report (Figure 1) valued Burberry at £5.117 billion(b) which, compared to Morningstar’s (2023)
5-year valuation of £7.63b, is over £2b lower than institutional valuation (Morningstar,2023).
However, Infront Analytics (2023) put the EV/EBITDA valuation at £5.22b for the UK which is more in
line with the report (InfrontAnylitics,2023).
Regarding the horizon period chosen in the report (figure 1), Mauboussin (1997) states that a 10-
year competitive advantage period (CAP) requires high return on capital, low rate of industry
change, and high barriers to entry (Mauboussin,1997). Burberry was identified to have high return
on invested capital compared to its cost of capital and the S&P500 returns(Marketwatch,2023),
which is a good indication of a healthy ROIC (Jiang & Koller,2007). A SWOT analysis identified
Burberry to have ‘extreme’ competition with an emphasis on fake products being a notable threat to
their advantage (IIDE,2021). MarketLine (2022) identifies that the industry has a low barrier to entry
force and interestingly, highlight the relatively high bargaining power of consumers due to low
switching costs. Concluding this information, the report justified a 7-year horizon period due to
these 3 factors balancing out the CAP between 5 and 10 years and Mauboussin (2006) warning
against choosing a horizon period that is too short (Mauboussin,2006).
Regarding the spread between ROIC and the cost of capital, Mauboussin (1997) highlights that
although a company can vary in performance over the CAP, the relationship between ROIC and cost
of capital held true. Knowing this, an average of the ROIC was chosen along with an average beta,
risk-free rate, and risk premium(Fernandez,2022; Table 4) which shows evidence of competitive
advantage. Using Yahoo finance(Yahoo,2023), a ROIC calculation(Yahoo,2017) was done to try and
get an understanding of how realistic the average was(Table1). It is worth mentioning however,
Burberry’s report changed how ROIC was calculated (Burberry,2022) so data was only taken up to
2020 as this would impact the results. After perpetuities Burberry will experience the ‘reversion-to-
the-mean phenomenon’ where the ROIC will eventually meet the cost of capital (Mauboussin,2006)
meaning that the spread will narrow due to decreasing ROIC and similar, but not rigid, cost of
capital.
Growth is forecasted by analysts and is found to be highly correlated across them and is more
accurate with large firms like Burberry however, accuracy tends to decrease with greater forecast
period (Damodaran,nd). The luxury clothing industry is nothing short of a mature industry and Jiang
and Koller (2007) state that it is impossible to avoid slow growth in such maturity which means the
growth figure used had to be relatively low compared to the ROIC. Using this information, a growth
figure was generated from an average of different analytical values including Burberry’s financial
report. Where possible, a 5-year forecast was used, while this reduces accuracy which can be
observed in the variable figures in table 2, it averaged to create an acceptable figure of 7.2%. After
the competitive advantage period, growth will drop off or stay the same since growth has no link to
value creation like ROIC does (Mauboussin,2006). Considering this, growth was chosen to take the
industry average since it is not in competitive advantage by its definition.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller DannyAlex. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
