100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Fam1001f- Media in South Africa Notes $11.50   Add to cart

Class notes

Fam1001f- Media in South Africa Notes

 9 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

These notes look at media in the context of South Africa, including the various tiers, key trends, it's history and summaries of prescribed readings Quality stuff!! U'll need it!!

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • May 20, 2024
  • 7
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • Prof. walton
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Media in SA
3 tiers: Public, Commercial, Community

More broadcasters  more content diversity



 Public Media

SABC: Not a state owned broadcaster, but is accountable to a board appointed by
parliament.
However, heavily reliant on commercial revenue (about 85% of revenue). Advertisers can
begin to control the content.
Conflict over management issues and political interference. Should be autonomous from
centres of power.
Focus on providing media to all people

Supposedly accountable to the public



2: Commercial Media

Sees the audience as consumers

Print: Media 24, Times Media, Independent newspapers, Caxton, TNA magazine

TV: Multichoice (umbrella for DSTC, M-net + Supersport), E-Tv (free to air)

Radio: Primedia (KFM, Cape Talk), SABC (5fm, Metro fm, Goodhope fm)



3: Community Media

Issues: sustainability + commercial pressures

Purpose: to communicate within different communities (of interest + geography)
MDDA: Media Dev. & Diversity Agency. Government funding and training for non-commercial
community media (but lacks funds)



Normative Environment (the ideal)

 Constitutional democracy

 Self-regulatory environment (where professionals regulate their own conduct, not the
government): Broadcasting Complaints Commission established by National Association of
Broadcasters press council.

 Ethical codes: institutional and professional. Commit to upholding certain ethical
standards.

, Issues + Trends:

 Conglomeration: media-ownership becomes concentrated to certain conglomerates

 Commercialisation + tabloidization (offshoot): media is increasingly influenced by need for
money as opposed to the greater good.

 Online growth: threats but also opportunities

 Access + voice

 Threats to media freedom (eg: the Secrecy bill)



20 years of SA media ownership
For a long time (during apartheid), SA media was a static organisation.

Historically, SA press was partisan (openly supported a political party).
During apartheid: lack of media dynamism, racially discrete news consumption, total white
ownership, and lack of diversity.
SABC had a monopoly on SA media, but excluded the homelands where independent media started
to grow (but was limited).

1994: media controlled by white people and the government. Remained a duopoly: Anglo-American
(English language press) and Afrikaans language press (Sanlam and Old Mutual).

1994 and today: four big media groups (but now: shift in ownership and influence).

4 big media groups in 1994: Times Media ; The Argus ; Naspers ; Pescor <- later replaced by Caxton

Foreign investors saw opportunity in post-apartheid SA. Aided in the changing of media ownership to
prevent monopolisation.
Broadcasting could earn more money through advertising, so print media declined.

Post 1994: characterised by buying, selling + unbundling of media groups.
Anglo-American Corporation (mining) ----- Times Media + Argus

Sanlam, Anglo-American and Old Mutual: held ¾ of the economy through the JSE (in 1990). Were
able to dictate policy in their favour due to economic control. In 2009 they only held ¼ of the JSE
(diversification).
Anglo-American had control through Joburg Consolidated Investment ltd.

Later split into 3, including Johnnic (contained Times Media and Argus)
Most of Anglo’s holdings in Johnnic sold to a consortium on black investors.

But became unfocused and indecisive. Unbundled and sold off.

Johnnic faded away over time.

Caxton: ad-heavy, free community newspapers.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anyiamgeorge19. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.50
  • (0)
  Add to cart