100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
Summary OCR A-Level Psychology: Themes Through Core Studies (H567): Evaluation of The Social Area, Comparisons of Studies, Key Words, flashcards$5.82
Add to cart
Summary OCR A-Level Psychology: Themes Through Core Studies (H567): Evaluation of The Social Area, Comparisons of Studies, Key Words, flashcards
7 views 0 purchase
Course
Themes Through Core Studies (H567)
Institution
OCR
Book
OCR A Level Psychology: AS and Year 1
This Document Includes:
- A full DETAILED SUMMARY of the Area
- The Key Principle
- Applications
- Strengths/Weaknesses of the Area
- Comparisons of 4 Studies (Milgram, Bocchiaro, Piliavin, Levine)
- Key Words
- A link to a Quizlet flashcard set
- Social, Cultural, Individual Diversity
Summary OCR A-Level Psychology: Themes Through Core Studies (H567): Blakemore and Cooper Summary, Key Points, Flashcards.
All for this textbook (10)
Written for
A/AS Level
OCR
Psychology
Themes Through Core Studies (H567)
All documents for this subject (9)
Seller
Follow
JStevensStudy
Reviews received
Content preview
Comparison of Studies Milgram & Bocchiaro et al.
Key Theme:
Responses to People in Authority – Both studies found that
participants were willing to act Unethically when ordered to by
people in authority.
Milgram used a Laboratory procedure to test Destructive
Obedience, showing that people are surprisingly likely to obey orders
to carry out immoral acts. Bocchiaro et al., used a similar Laboratory
procedure to show that people were also surprisingly likely to obey
instructions to encourage people to take part in an Unethical
experiment. They also found that people rarely took the opportunity
to blow the whistle on the experimenter.
Similarities:
- Investigated Obedience to direct orders to harm others
- Laboratory procedures with a single condition (Independent
Measures).
- Samples recruited using an advert (Self-selected Sampling).
- Collected Quantitative Data un the form of Obedience rates.
Differences:
- Milgram’s study was Ethically controversial study (Deception
to the true aim of the study). Whereas Bocchiaro et al.’s was
Ethically sound (Consent Form used).
- Milgram used an all-male Sample (as he wanted to test why
WW2 soldiers were so obedient). Whereas Bocchiaro et al.
used males and females (Yet, Bocchiaro et al. has a clear
Gender Ratio to females).
- Milgram’s research is applicable to real-world atrocities like the
Holocaust and can explain why it possibly happened with the
compliance of Nazis. Whereas Bocchiaro et al.’s research is
applicable to Whistleblowing in the workplace.
, - Milgram uses both Quantitative and Qualitative Data. Whereas
Bocchiaro et al. only uses Quantitative Data.
Individual Diversity:
This area of research led to an understanding of terrible historical
events such as the holocaust and how individuals may be led to
behave in ways, they would never predict they would. This has led to
the idea that all individuals are susceptible; if they are asked by a
figure in authority, to gradually carry out terrible acts they would
previously have said were inconceivable. Bocchiaro et al found
similar results and extended the evidence to include female
behaviour along with male behaviour.
Social Diversity:
Both pieces of research highlight the need for society to question
authority further as obedience levels in both studies were seen to be
high. The contemporary study, Bocchiaro et al, uses students so may
be limited in its ability to explain how different groups in society may
behave but does look at a different part of society to Milgram who
studied volunteers with a range of occupations.
Cultural Diversity:
Bocchiaro furthered Milgram’s Ethnocentric research and showed
that obedience is high cross-culturally as well as the importance of
considering individual explanations alongside situational ones. The
contemporary study also showed that obedience was similar over
time and research in this area suggests that people are inherently
obedient.
Comparison of Studies Piliavin et al & Levine et al
Key Theme:
Responses to People in Need – Both studies looked at Variables
affecting helping behaviour towards strangers. Piliavin et al. looked
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller JStevensStudy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
