Summary Lancastrians, Yorkists and Henry VII Breadth Essay Plans
27 views 1 purchase
Course
Lancastrians, Yorkists and Henry VII 1399-1509
Institution
PEARSON (PEARSON)
This document covers every Breadth Essay Topic for the Lancastrians, Yorkists and Henry VII A-Level History topic, made by an A* student. Utilising wider reading from historians as well as a myriad of resources makes these essay plans a unique find and I assure you will not regret purchasing.
Was war or diplomacy of the greatest benefit to the English crown in the period 1399-1509?
• Foreign war something of a ‘double-edged sword’ (H. Carrel) for late medieval monarchs
• One hand seen as king’s sovereign duty protect realm outside + internal threats
• Kings expected act as military leaders + prove skills as warrior/commander as demanded by medieval concepts of war
• Foreign war costly; defeats seriously damage king’s status (Commons often used requests for taxation as opportunity raise
grievance concerning government of realm)
War (1399-1509) Diplomacy (1399-1509)
Greatest • Henry V most successful monarch terms foreign war: massively • Henry IV survived threats to regime due to use international diplomacy:
benefit increased popularity with nobles who benefitted substantially from ➢ Marriage 1402 daughter Blanche to Ludwig (son of) Count Palatine of Rhine + successful
victories (land Normandy/titles provided) alliance with Brittany (strengthened hand vs French)
• Treaty of Troyes 1420 made Henry V heir to throne: apex of Hundred ➢ Informal alliance 1402/1403 with King Portugal + King Castille; Henry IV invited to member
Years War for England + culmination important military victories such as Order of Garter (continental mark status/military prowess + important diplomatic tool)
Agincourt 1415 + Rouen 1919; Henry V secured his reputation as the ➢ 1406 marriage other daughter Philippa to King Norway/Sweden/Denmark + supported
quintessential ‘good king.’ Emphasised how the benefits of war at large relations with Hanseatic League
determined by the capability of the King to rule effectively (vs • Henry V utilised diplomacy before invasion France 1415: conciliatory attitude towards
ineptitude); Treaty of Troyes seen as a ‘political high-watermark’ (by Welsh, rehabilitated Percy family to protect Scottish border; Jan 1414 10 year truce with
many contemporary historians Brittany
• Success in war resulted in parliament more generous to grants for • The Treaty of Picquigny: Edward IV’s planned invasion France 1468 to promote real +
taxation to increase revenue: ‘briefest + least controversial parliament personal glory/political security didn’t go ahead; 1474: secured alliance with Burgundy vs
of the century’ (T. Frulovisi) under Henry V + contributed to parliament’s France + granted special tax 1/10th all income by parliament Nov 1472 (13k archers for
satisfaction reduced threat French invasion on practical level + reduced campaign): King Louis XI France effectively ‘bought-off’ invasion (7 year truce England +
French naval rads South Coast (damages >£12k to areas such as Kent) France, Marriage Dauphin Charles to Edward’s eldest daughter, Elizabeth + £15k upfront
• Increased finances due to pillaging/fiscal endeavours: events such as payment with £10k pa ‘pension’
besieging Rouen July to Jan 1919 created recognition of Henry V as their • Henry VII + foreign diplomacy rally support before Battle of Bosworth 1485: relationships
‘feudal lord’ + fined Rouen £50k (placed the city under fiscal strain at Duke Brittany allowing supporters join; French gov provided Henry money + ships/supplies
expense of increasing financial stability of English crown) launch invasion; Wales provided 2k-4k troops as area rely considerable support + Scots
• Henry V focused developing new administrations in conquered provided similar no. troops
territories + substantial grants of land: aimed to increase control over • Trade Alliance ‘Magnus Intercursus’ 1496: Margaret of Burgundy significant role assist those
swathes French land and advance power of English crown causing difficulties Henry VII such as Francis Lovell; trade agreement obliged Margaret bring
political manoeuvring end + evidence foreign trade diplomacy ensuring domestic political
stability
• The Spanish Marriage 1499: late 15th century, Spain ruled by King Ferdinand II of Aragon +
wife + 2nd cousin, Queen Isabella I of Castille; referred jointly ‘Catholic monarchs’: title
granted by Pope Alexander VI 1494 recognition defence Catholic faith
➢ Their 5 children made politically significant foreign marriages as part diplomatic endeavours;
youngest daughter, Katherine of Aragon married to Henry VII’s eldest son, Prince Arthur
(1499)
➢ Henry VII keen form alliance: security Tudor dynasty uncertain (Henry’s claim tenuous:
usurpation Battle of Bosworth 1485); marriage eldest son + Spanish princess highly
advantageous, gaining Tudors prospect military support abroad + strengthening family’s
royal status immeasurably (no. trade agreements: Treaty of Medina del Campo 1489)
Not the • Henry V bequeathed to his son (Henry VI) ‘a poisoned chalice’ (H. • Diplomatic exchanges failed under Henry IV 10th Nov 1399: left English little after planned
greatest Carrel): overshadowed reign Henry VI + need for continuing requests invasion of Scotland (15k soldiers); failed acquire peaceful relationship with Robert III +
taxation to further war effort made regime vulnerable to criticism; factor causing Scrope’s Rebellion of May 1405
benefit exacerbated by the military situation rapidly diminishing after siege of • Anglo-Burgundian alliance ends1435: Henry V’s death 1432 serious blow English
Orleans late 1420s unity/strength (alliance successful vs Armangnacs 1420s); Congress of Arras 1435 critical
• Considerable strain crown finances due to invasion: growing lack of blow English hopes consolidating dual-monarchy + ‘forcing English into a war of
enthusiasm for war + many disillusioned by reduction in living standards retrenchment’ (Royle)
due to increased taxation for military endeavours; C.T. Allamand argues • Consequences of Treaty of Picquigny: Edward IV/army heavily criticised due to
‘contemporaries regarded Troyes as an unworkable agreement for much dishonourable settlement + anger taxes/benevolences not returned + contributed to
of 1420s due to increased financial burdens on the crown’ subsequent reputation avaricious monarch; Edward IV raised money through ‘benevolences’
• War with France placed economic strain on areas within England: for + sexual favours with wives wealthy London merchants (indicative noted lustfulness
e.g., Gascony’s wine exports disrupted + fell >50%; damaged English appearing crossed class barriers + willingness utilise charm manipulate subjects pursue
interests in Bristol due to the economic hub of Bristol Port situated objectives diplomacy)
there • Consequences Spanish Marriage 1499: planned marriage never took place owing
• War became long-standing problem for Henry VI: contemporary disagreements 1490’s surrounding pretender throne, Perkin Warbeck’s rebellion (Warbeck
historians such as A.J. Pollard regard Henry VI ‘as more of a vacuum gained international support for cause, particularly areas hostile England (Scot, Ireland,
then a personality’ + his uniform weakness exacerbated other France, Austria))
mechanics of government such as managing finance (crown in debt ➢ Henry VII shaken, accused Ferdinand + Isabella supporting Warbeck (quickly acted reassure
>£360k) + the nobility (the Crown owed the Duke of York >£36k) him + proxy marriage occurred Arthur/Katherine May 1499)
• Treaty of Tours 1444: although attempted negotiate peace + marriage ➢ Incident Katherine + Arthur’s 1st meeting suggest tensions English + Spanish entourages
1445 Henry VI + Margaret of Anjou; problematicality the Treaty regarding sexual etiquette, perceptions female modesty + consummation marriage; Spanish
surrendered Maine to France (hard fought + kept secret) created outcry ambassador to England, Doctor de Puebla argued marriage shouldn’t be consummated;
in England + helped to promote factionalism within English courts + deliberate ploy by Spanish keep marriage unconsummated long as possible; reflected
considerable hostility to Henry VI/Anjou + favourites: Somerset, Suffolk Spain’s continuing unease about Tudor regime
+ Edmund Beaufort • Spanish Marriage 1499 protracted arrangement, politically + economically: highly
• Defeats of early 1450s regarded as a disaster for England + personal problematic when cut short due to Arthur’s untimely death
catastrophe for King Henry VI: one of many grievances causing Cade’s ➢ Both Catholic monarchs + Henry VII keen ensure alliance continued + suggest Katherine
Rebellion of 1450 due to large swathes of the population disillusioned marry Arthur’s younger brother, Henry (Church didn’t allow marriage: needed papal
with Henry VI’s governance dispensation: arrived 1504)
➢ Henry VII highlighted fact Ferdinand hadn’t paid 2nd instalment Katherine’s dowry + financial
wrangling between both countries bitter
• Death Henry VII April 1509 changed situation: his son, new King Henry VIII took different
direction foreign policy (alliance with Spain as anti-French): 11th June 1509, Katherine
Aragon married Henry VIII + became Queen of England
, How accurate is it to say that retaining decreased in importance in the years 1399-1509?
• Control of land crucial to political power late Middle Ages + necessary understand feudal system + how some contemporaries
argue the use of retaining was disintegrating
Retaining decreased in importance 1399-1509 Retaining increased/constant in importance 1399-1509
• 14th/15th centuries, feudal system gradually disintegrating: • Feudal relationships still had obligations on both sides: Lord
changed described by historians such as C. Plummer + K.B. expected provide vassals not only with use fief but
McFarlane as ‘bastard feudalism’ (traditional feudal protection from attacks by interlopes + certain legal
relationship hereditary with families of vassals having long- protection if vassal in trouble with law + emphasis ‘good
term commitment to their Lord) lordship’
• Traditional feudalism problematic as estates divided • Vassals still required take oaths of fealty: required for ex
through inheritance + marriage: not always enough come to Lord’s aid if called upon (vassal Lord’s retainer) +
property/land provide vassals + no control over type of attending the lord’s local court (act as adviser)
vassal (due to feudal holdings descending through family • Lord still gave each retainer a livery designed to advertise
line) their loyalties to a Lord + easier to stop paying a
• System vassalage shifted from land as core system to where disobedient retainer under ‘bastard feudalism’: incentivised
annual cash payments made in return for military/non- more Lords take on more vassals + more control over who
military services: focus instead on personal relationships + to bind themselves to
protected by indentures of mutual dependence + loyalty for • Traditional view retaining upmost importance during W of
lifetime of parties concerned only R’s: fluid system social relationships key factor casing civil
• Less demand for retinues towards the close of the period: unrest as reflected more widespread destabilisation of
foreign policy/diplomacy centred around resolving society; loyalty of large retinues to individual noblemen
disagreements instead of conquest factor making ‘over-mighty subject’ (in effect used as
• Contemporary criticism towards the end of the period that private armies)
Lords failed to control these retinues + became more • Retinue needed if lords were to provide necessary no.
erratic: extended retinues unduly with groups of men armed men for king’s war: important factor later medieval
paying fees/given livery despite little connection to lord period with Hundred’s Year War in France (at height
(last group referred to as ‘liverymen’ in primary sources + Agincourt 1415 + early 1420s); proved necessary for
viewed with suspicion/complaints causing disturbances to defence of Scottish border throughout 1399-1509
the peace)
• Contemporaries regarded it essential great nobles had large
• Parliament legislated + passed 3 Acts late 1390s which
followings: magnate for, expected have large no. servants
reflects contemporary concern regarding growing instability
who resided in household, as well as a retinue of men
Richard II + potential lawlessness within realm: built upon
by Retinue legislation 1468 (Edward IV), outlawing practice bound to him via indentures
retaining except for legal advisers, domestic servants, • Considerable debate among historians about the extent
estate officials + those in ‘lawful service’ this shift towards cash relationships responsible for
• Consistent awareness of monarchs to balance the power of breakdown law/order late medieval period: contemporaries
retaining + limit size retinues: monarch needed to maintain concerned regarding development private retinues +
sufficient popularity among nobles vs asserting authority suggests importance didn’t decrease due to importance of
ensure not challenged or create disorder in kingdom retaining during W of R’s
• Henry VII’s retaining legislation 1504: passed a statute that • 1468 legislation ‘lawful service’ proved a major loophole:
lords had to receive written permission in form of a license the practice of maintenance among the great lords
from king to retain men + provide list of retainers for continued unabated; king’s criticised the lawlessness of
approval; those who disobeyed fined heavily
some retinues but remained aware in reality they were
essential for medieval political + military system function
(basis of national armies in 1475 + 1492)
• The liverymen of nobles who were loyal to the King proved
highly beneficial to a monarch throughout the period:
Henry VII discovered during Lambert Simnel’s rebellion
1487 that retaining essential for expression political power
• Loyal associates of Henry VII such as Sir Thomas Lovell still
developed extensive affinities in the early 1500s
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller harrisonshaw. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $13.63. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
