100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
IOS2601 ASSIGNMENT1 SEMESTER 2 ANS 2023 $2.83   Add to cart

Other

IOS2601 ASSIGNMENT1 SEMESTER 2 ANS 2023

 24 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

IOS2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 2023

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • August 7, 2023
  • 3
  • 2023/2024
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
IOS2601

ASSIGNMENT 1

SEMESTER 2 2023

PublIc, cONSTITuTIONAl ANd INTERNATIONAl lAw




QUESTION 1



(a) Facts of the Jaga case:

In the case of Jaga v Dönges (1950) 4 SA 653 (A), the plaintiff, a woman named Jaga, brought an
action against the defendant, Dönges, for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. The
accident occurred when the defendant's car collided with a bicycle that the plaintiff was riding. As a
result of the collision, the plaintiff suffered injuries and incurred medical expenses.

During the trial, the defendant argued that the plaintiff was partly responsible for the accident due
to her own negligence. The trial court found the plaintiff to be 75% responsible for the accident and
the defendant 25% responsible. Consequently, the court reduced the damages awarded to the
plaintiff proportionately.

The case was taken to the Appellate Division (now the Supreme Court of Appeal) on appeal, where
the main issue was the proper interpretation and application of the Apportionment of Damages Act,
a statute that governed the apportionment of liability in cases of contributory negligence.



(b) The dominant interpretive approach before 1994 as followed by the majority in Jaga:

Before 1994, the dominant interpretive approach followed in South African courts was a strict literal
or textual approach to statutory interpretation. This approach involved looking only at the plain
meaning of the words used in the statute, without considering the underlying purpose or policy
objectives of the legislation. Judges were expected to apply the law as it was written, even if the
consequences appeared unjust or unreasonable.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GoldenKey. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.83. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76799 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.83  3x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart