Summary Edexcel Government and Politics: PM and Executive essay plans
17 views 0 purchase
Course
PM and executive
Institution
PEARSON (PEARSON)
5 detailed 30-mark essay plans with matched arguments including examples
1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the executive
2. Evaluate the view that the cabinet is no longer important in UK politics
3. Evaluate the extent to which IMR and CMR remains important in the UK
4. Evaluate the view tha...
Effective Ineffective
Proposing legislation Dependent on the size of support from
- announces new programme at the start of parliament
each parliamentary session - when party dominance is challenged =
- e.g. 2015 proposals = EU referendum, govt can dominate = can lead to backbench
amend West Lothian question and protect rebellion e.g. 2021- 99 tory MPs rebelled
public services against strokes against Boris’ plan-B COVID measures
- make sure manifesto promises are met - e.g. 2017-2019 = May had her Brexit deal
e.g. 2019 ‘Get Brexit Done’ rejected three times, including a defeat of
- consult interested pressure groups and 230 votes
professionals first e.g. 2015 = consult with - e.g. 2010-2015 coalition = controversy
employees about introducing over relationship with EU = caused
apprenticeship levy = introduced in 2017 Cameron to resign
Propose budget Recently ineffective proposals
- created by Chancellor which is revealed to - e.g. Liz Truss U-turn on mini budget = fired
Cabinet chancellor and resigned = shortest term as
- sets out plans for changes in govt PM
spending and taxation
- e.g. Truss mini budget = tax cuts
- Rishi = halve inflation
Making policy decisions Still has to be compatible with HRA
- effective aims for future prosperity - parliamentary sovereignty means that
- e.g. 2010-2015 = introduce universal laws must abide with other laws including
credit, more competition in NHS HRA = protects rights
- e.g. emergency decisions e.g. Coronavirus - unconstitutional laws can be struck down
Act 2020 by Supreme Court
- e.g. R v Chief Constable of Greater
Manchester 2013 = police act 1997
interfering with tight to respect for private
life more than in necessary to protect
civilians violation of Article 8
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TrishaM. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.02. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
