Evaluates the extent to which collective responsibility remains a desirable tenet of the UK political system. Replete w/ precise evidence and a nuanced, evaluative argument. Provides framework for a full essay.
This helped me to achieve a high A* in Politics (80/84 in this paper). I now study a...
Evaluate the view that collective responsibility has a positive impact on the UK’s political system
Introduction Define: Argument:
Paragraph 1: Weak argument point 1: Weak argument point 2:
Accountability Collective responsibility confers excessive
power on the Prime Minister by narrowing
the scope of dissent in government.
Collective responsibility stipulates that all
ministers must publicly support
government policies, even if they privately
disagree with them. Prime Ministers can
therefore rely on the payroll vote, which
has increased considerably in recent years.
270 ministers – bound by collective resp.
Payroll vote has increased.
Strong argument point 1: Strong argument point 2:
CR ensures ministers are held accountable: Collective resp. can also ensure govt is held
Gavin Williamson was fired by Theresa accountable by ministers: in 1990,
May in 2019 after a leak from a National Geoffrey Howe resigned from his post as
Security Council meeting on Huawei. Deputy PM, citing dissatisfaction with
Williamson suspected of authorizing the Thatcher’s dictatorial, ‘kitchen cabinet’
leak – collective responsibility ensures that leadership style. Less than a month after
held accountable. Howe’s resignation, Thatcher had left
office.
Paragraph 2: Weak argument point 1: Weak argument point 2:
Clarity and The convention of collective resp. can be PMs can also be too weak to enforce the
uniformity of ‘stretched’: after backbench MPs voted convention: Theresa May was unable to
policy + against the 2012 House of Lords Reform fire cabinet ministers who, in March 2019,
policymaking Bill, which had been championed by the defied the whip and abstained on a
Lib Dems, Nick Clegg instructed Lib Dem motion ruling on a ‘no deal’ Brexit.
MPs to support an opposition
amendment. This delayed constituency
boundary reforms that were backed by the
government – effectively forced the PM to
suspend collective responsibility.
Fact that it CAN be suspended (this is a
direct feature + consequence of CMR
itself).
Strong argument point 1: Strong argument point 2:
BUT collective responsibility is crucial in Javid and Sunak
providing clarity – if the govt’s position on
an issue is unclear, or if policy appears to
be constantly changing, it becomes
difficult for opposition parties and voters
to hold the government collectively
accountable, and for businesses to make
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller alexupshall. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
