Criminal Civil
® Public law ® Private law
Parties involved ® State vs accused ® Plaintiff vs Defendant
Burden of proof ® State bears onus ® Party who alleges must prove
® State needs to prove guilt of allegations
the accused ® Usually, plaintiff
Onus of proof met ® Prove beyond reasonable ® Prove on a balance of
doubt probabilities
Freedom of parties ® State = dominitis litis (master ® Parties decided whether they
to decide of proceedings) want to initiate proceedings or
® They alone decide to not
prosecute or not ® Plaintiff institutes action,
® Accused does not have a say defendant decides to oppose
claim or not
Aim ® Punish the accused ® For remedy or clarification
Outcome ® Accused is found guilty or not ® Action or application allowed or
guilty dismissed
Overlap of both civil and criminal
- S v Pistorius
- Pistorius – prosecuted on charge of murder (killing girlfriend) – criminal case
- Reeva Steenkamp financially supported parents
- Could have instituted civil case to claim damages to redress imbalance caused by Oscar’s conduct
Sources of law
1. Common Law
- Primary source
- SA law is uncodified
- Influence of common law is primarily by Roman Dutch law
- Murder and rape are examples of crimes inherited from Roman Dutch Law
- Common law can be developed by courts à Masiya v Director of Public Prosecution
Masiya vs Director of Public Prosecution
® The definition of rape broadened to include anal penetration and not just vaginal penetration
2. Legislation
- Legislation can create new offences also known as statutory crimes
- Drugs and Drug trafficking Act 140 of 1992
- Maintenance Act 99 of 1998
- National Road traffic Act 93 of 1996
- Tabacco Products control Act 93 of 1993
- Criminal Law amendment act 32 of 2007
, Specific Crimes
- crimes are punishable because they threaten the interest of individuals and of society as a whole
- categories into 4 fields (depends on the interest threatened)
1. Crime against another person that threatens human life
- Murder or capable homicide (crime results in death)
- Assault (crime results in only injury)
- Infringes on constitutional rights eg: right to life)
2. Crimes against another person’s property
- Infringement on property rights (real right)
- Property is protected in s25 of the Constitution
- Theft
3. Crimes against the state
- Most serious = treason
- Treason is conduct aimed at overthrowing or jeopardizing the existence of the state
- Contempt of court = not comply with a court order
4. Morality crimes
- Incest, public indecency
- Community mores enforced by law
International Criminal Court (ICC)
- Brought about to ensure those responsible for massive atrocities such as genocide or war crimes
are punished
- Court is based in Hague
- Only has jurisdiction if a particular state is unwilling or unable to prosecute
Elements of a Crime
All 3 have to be present for it to be said that a crime has been committed:
1. Conduct (act) or omission
2. Which is against the law
3. Where the accused was at fault
Sometimes a causal link between the act and the eventual consequence of the act needs to be present
, CONDUCT
- Crime results from human action/conduct
- Pulling the trigger on someone and them dying (action) can lead to conviction of murder
- To do nothing (omission) also qualifies as an action that leads to a crime ( S v Russel )
UNLAWFULLNESS/AGAINST THE LAW
- The act must be against the law
- CERTAIN acts that are against the law may be allowed
o Eg: self-defense/private defense (to save your own life)
o Strict requirements have to be met to rely successfully on this defense ( R v Zikalala )
- Sometimes statues provides authority for unlawful behaviour
o Violence may be used when arresting a person if such a person resists arrest or tries to
escape
- Necessity
o Eg: person breaking into someone’s car to save a baby from suffocating from heat
FAULT
- Concerns the blameworthy state of the mind of the offender
® Easiest to prove ® Main objective is not to ® Person forsees that an
® Person knowingly and commit unlawful act, but action may result in a
willingly wants to act proceeds to commit act to consequence, they
® Intentional killing of another achieve main objective nonetheless continue with
person = murder ® A Homeless man main the action
objective to get access to ® S v Mitchell
secure warm place, breaks ® Mitchell found guilty of
window of car to sleep in murder for killing the child
car after throwing stones
® In the process commits
unlawful act-may be
charged with malicious
damage to property
(indirect intention)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller universitylearner. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.86. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.