Summary
Samenvatting Bioinformatics & Genome Technology
- Course
- Institution
Summary of 126 pages for the course Bioinformatics & Genome Technology at KU Leuven
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
feline2
Reviews received
Content preview
BIOINFORMATICS & GENOME TECHNOLOGY: Genome AnalysisChapter 1: Genome complexity and genome mapping
1. Genome structure and organization
• Genome complexity = a crucial factor in genome analysis (increasing genome complexity; variability)
• Genome complexity: DNA content
o Large variation is not necessary reflected in approx. number of genes (S3)
▪ Humans 30.000 genes, but smaller variation tov bacteria, bec much more non coding DNA
o Human DNA content
▪ few protein coding genes & pseudogenes, many unique non-coding & repetitive DNA
▪ interspersed repeats: DNA transposon, Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE), Short
interspersed nuclear elements (SINE), LTR retrotransposon
▪ tandem repeats: telomers etc.
• Transposons:
o Classification according to mode of transposition
▪ 1) DNA transposons = cut and paste = class II: using DNA intermediate
▪ 2) retrotransposons = via replicative mechanism = class I: using mRNA intermediate
o Classification according to autonomy
▪ 1) autonomous: encode all gene products necessary for transposition
• DNA transposons (vb Tc1/mariner family), Non-LTR retrotransposons (vb LINEs), LTR
retrotransposons (vb ty/copia/HERV)
▪ 2) non autonomous: no coding capacity
• SINEs (vb Alu elements), processed pseudogenes
o General: The eukaryotic genome = very plastic = there are rearrangements, insertions/deletions
• Genome complexity in eukaryotes
o From DNA -> RNA: reduction in complexity: RNA represents 5% of genome
o From pre-MRNA -> to mature mRNA via RNA processing (differential splicing): increase in complexity
o Conclusion: same gene results in different RNA molecule/different coding sequences (vb male vs
female specific splicing) => this increases complexity at transcription level
• Reduction of complexity: DNA renaturation kinetics
o = method to physically distinguish between vb. regions of coding DNA or repetitive DNA (zie S4)
▪ After denaturation,renaturation of repetitive DNA = easier tov unique protein coding DNA
▪ Reden: repetitive DNA has more copies => not exact copies find each other, but also highly
similar copies will find each other fast => gevolg: more rapid renaturation, not specific
o = basis of Cot filtration technique
▪ = to separate (physically) the repetitive DNA sequences from "gene-rich" single/low-copy
sequences, thus allowing ‘focused’ sequencing on gene-rich genome regions
▪ Process of physically separating fractions of DNA
• 1) Denaturation of DNA => get ssDNA
• 2) Renaturation of ssDNA
o First: renaturation of Foldback DNA that is almost identical
o Second: renaturation of high & middle redundant (repetitive DNA) (low cot
value, high reassociation rate) (blue)
o Third: renaturation of single-low copy DNA (gene rich DNA) (high cot value,
low reassociation rate) (green)
▪ Renaturation process: Cot = [DNA] (mol/L) * renaturation time (sec) * Buffer factor
([cation], viscosity[DNA length])
• => At a given temperature
• Opm: k = reassociation rate (in M-1 sec-1 ); FB = foldback DNA (k & Cot undefined);
HR= high redundant; MR= middle redundant; SL = single-low copy
1
, ▪ What happens if we denature DNA to 95°C & rapidly or slowly cool down to roomT (T,
renaturation time parameters)
• 1) slowly: more time for right strands to find each other => correct renaturation
• 2) rapidly: not much time => repetitive DNA sticks together, unique DNA stays apart
o Cot filtration kinetics: calculation of Cot values
▪ Moment half of DNA is renatured: C/C0 = ½ => Cot value = 1/k
• In idealized reassociation curve in a Cot diagram: reaction half way = cot value
▪ Conclusion: In this manner the value of k can be derived experimentally from the
reassociation curve => This value depends on the cation concentration, temperature,
fragment size, etc.
o Cot filtration: HR, MR, SL
▪ 1) Sheared genomic DNA => denature, renature to certain cot value => get dsDNA formed:
highly repetitive DNA
▪ 2) ssDNA that hasn’t renatured yet: middle repetitive DNA & low copy DNA => denature,
renature to higher cot value => get dsDNA formed: middle repetitive DNA
▪ 3) ssDNA hasn’t renatured yet: low copy DNA => denature, renature to highest cot value =>
get dsDNA formed: low copy DNA
▪ Conclusion: increase of enrichment in unique DNA (zie rode fig)
2. Genome mapping and sequencing
• Different historical techniques to also reduce complexity in a sense of genome mapping
2.1 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)
• Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)
o 1) You have a normal allele & affected allele
▪ Affected allele can be:
• Loss of cleavage site by mutation vb: normal allele 3 recognition sites => affected 2
• DNA insertions/deletions
• Length variation in microsatellite repeats
o 2) Then use a probe in Southern blotting with DNA from parents/progeny for detection of the
affected offspring
▪ 1) Two Heterozygous parents: a normal allele & affected allele: large & short fragment
▪ 2) Offspring can be: normal, affected, heterozygous
• 2 affected alleles: only larger fragment
• 2 normal alleles: only short fragment
• Heterozygous: large & short fragment
o Goal: To fenotypically (for a fenotypical trait) link normal & affected alleles to a certain site & match
that site to presence or absence of a restriction site
2
, • Southern blotting:
o 1) Immobilize DNA on a permanent substrate
o 2) Directed identification of specific DNA sequences
o Method: Genomic DNA => restriction endonuclease cleavage => gel electrophoresis on agarose gel
=> denature in alkali & blot transfer to nitrocellulose membrane: ssDNA fragments are on that blot
▪ Add radioactive probe containing sequences complementary to gene X => see if probe binds
to certain positions vb to gene X
o Probe = 25-2000 bp ssDNA/RNA = complementary to the sequence being searched = labeled
2.2 Sequence-tagged sites (STS)
• Sequence-tagged sites (STS)
o = short unique sequence (200-300 bp)
o Method: A functional STS marker will amplify a single Locus and produce a single band after PCR
o Process: Design primer couple that amplifies a unique region/ single locus
▪ Vb: apply this on samples (12) => result: specific PCR products with some variation in PCR
products based on variability in the amplified region
o Nadeel: Time consuming to develop!
o Opm: same thing as rflp, but at rflp we used southern blot hybridization here simple PCR
2.3 Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP)
• Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP)
o Method: complex genome => get barcodes that in random way represent that genome
o 1) Cut chromosomal DNA at recognition sites with random restriction enzymes EcoRI & MseI (type II
RE) => create overhangs: some fragments have overhang EcoRI & MseI
o 2) Add adaptors (dsDNA with sticky ends): 1 adaptor fits overhang EcoRI & other adaptor fits
overhang MseI => result: fragments with 2 different ends are flanked by 2 different adaptors
o 3) Design 2 primers based on sequence of adaptors, to perform PCR (tekening):
▪ Make a primer that ends with a nucleotide (here T at 3’end) that queers the first nucleotide
of the insert (T)
▪ Gevolg: for any random fragment the chance that the last nucleotide will queer the first
nucleotide of the insert = ¼ & on other side the same: ¼
• => ¼ x ¼ = 1/16 = only 1 in 16 fragments will be amplified (here only 3 on ppt) in
PCR, if distance between the primers are not too far
▪ Resultaat: this oversimplified AFLP barcode representing one sample, allows us to compare
this to other samples
• => the better these samples match to each other, the more closely they are related
(phylogenetic tree)
o In highly complex organisms vb humans, using 2 restriction enzymes may not be simplified enough
▪ => we can simplify this further by making the primer larger vb G-C extra aan 3’ (tekening)
• => 1/16 x 1/16 = 1/256 fragments will be amplified
• AFLP Gelelektrophorese diagram:
o Instead of interpreting a gel (vorige slide)
o peaks of specific lengths represent each a PCR product => like this match peaks & quantify conserved
and differential bands, allowing to make phylogenetic tree
o depending on: choice of primers & endonucleases & reproducibility
2.4 Rapid Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
• Rapid Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
o = markers are DNA fragments from PCR amplification of random segments of genomic DNA with
single primer of arbitrary nucleotide sequence
3
, o = does not require specific knowledge of the DNA sequence of the target organism:
▪ But use short identical 10-mer primers => because they are short they bind at certain
positions in the genome => gevolg: the primers will or will not amplify a segment of DNA
(PCR), depending on positions that are complementary to the primers' sequence + primers
are close
▪ No fragment is produced if
• 1) primers annealed too far apart
• 2) 3' ends of the primers are not facing each other
• Limitations of RAPD
o Nearly all RAPD markers associated with a trait, are dominant
▪ Gevolg: no difference whether a DNA segment is amplified from a locus that is heterozygous
(1 copy) or homozygous (2 copies)
o Co-dominant RAPD markers (different-sized DNA segments amplified from the same locus) are
detected only rarely
o RAPD technique is notoriously laboratory dependent (PCR, quality template DNA) concentrations of
PCR components, and the PCR cycling conditions may greatly influence results
o Results can be difficult to interpret (primer/template mismatches => absent/ decreased PCR yield)
2.5 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)
• Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)
o = single-bp positions at which different sequence alternatives (alleles) exist in a population
▪ Vb: presence or absence of recognition site (rflp) = a SNP present or absent
o = highly abundant (1 per 1000 bp in humans)
▪ SNP in coding regions => potential function impact
▪ SNP in non-coding regions with or without phenotypic impact = potential marker*
• => Association of SNP to a certain phenotypical trait using LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM
o = potentially suitable markers for multifactorial disorders using LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM mapping*
o 2 approaches: Random genome-wide SNPs directed SNPs in specific loci
▪ => Dependent on cost, assay, throughput & accuracy
• Example: genetic variation in the human androgen receptor gene
o = primary indicator of alopecia in men (getting balt at early age)
o => Phenotypic linkage to specific gene(s)
o => Testing potential SNPs for strong correlation
▪ There was a single SNP that could be associated to whether you had alopecia or not
▪ vb Bowel disease: multiple SNPs at multiple positions determine different levels of the
disorders (not on or off)
• Biochemical reaction underlying SNP genotyping (ways to detect SNPs in a biochemical way)
o = Hybridisation or Enzyme based
o 1) Hybridisation with allele-specific oligonucleotides (ASOs) probes
▪ 1) 2 probes (ASOs) complementary to the SNPs variations
• The SNP position is centrally located within the probe
▪ 2) Only perfectly matched probes are stable vb A in probe & T in sequence (SNP)
▪ 3) Mismatches are unstable
▪ => allows to see based on hybridization whether a certain SNP is present or absent
o 2) Allele-specific primer extension
▪ 1) Allele specific Primer anneals to the SNP adjacent region
• Primer is complementary to the SNP at the 3’ end
▪ 2) Only matching primers will extend using DNAP (PCR reaction)
▪ 3) Mismatch => no binding, no extension, no PCR products formed
o 3) Minisequencing
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller feline2. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.91. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now