100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Public Law - Illegality revision notes (semester 2) $4.04   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Public Law - Illegality revision notes (semester 2)

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Documents containing all the relevant information about the topic, condensed into colour coded tables to enable easier memorisation and order. I achieved a first class in public law using these notes.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • January 14, 2024
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Illegality – delegation and (improper) purposes


“Judicial review has I think developed to a stage today when…one can conveniently classify
under three heads the grounds upon which administrative action is subject to control by
judicial review.
• The first ground I would call ‘illegality,’
• the second ‘irrationality’ and
• the third "procedural impropriety.’”

(Lord Diplock in the GCHQ case)

ILLEGALITY - DELEGATION

ISSUE: The issue in this scenario is under the ground of what Diplock in the GCHQ case
called, ‘illegality’ and more specifically this engages with delegation.

ARTICULATE LEGAL TEST Don’t delegate discretionary power

An authority to which the exercise of a discretion has been
entrusted cannot delegate the exercise of its discretion to
another unless clearly authorized to do so

AUTHORITY FOR TEST Barnard
Lavender
EXCEPTIONS!!! Carltona case does provide an exception to this rule which is
that government ministers can delegate to others in your
department or an executive agency

Adams case which might destabilise the rule in Carltona as it
explains how ministers cannot delegate decisions which have
particularly momentous consequences (such as being
detained!!)


THEN APPLY TO FACTS OF PROBLEM QUESTION!!!

Possible cues in a problem question
 a decision maker asking someone else to make decisions for them
 a decision maker routinely relying on someone else’s views
 situations where it is ambiguous who is really making the decisions
 a minister delegating a particularly momentous decision (e.g., to detain someone)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller miaalunt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.04. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79976 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.04
  • (0)
  Add to cart