100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LEV3701 Assignment 1 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023 $2.71   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LEV3701 Assignment 1 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023

 3 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

LEV3701 Assignment 1 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester % TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. For assistance call or us on .

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • August 22, 2023
  • 10
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
LEV3701
ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 2023

, Lev3701 - assignment 1

Q1

/ Semester2 / LEV3701-23-S2 / Welcome Message / Assessment
1


Quiz navigation
Question 1
. . . A Not yet answered
Consider the following statements about the onus of proof and the evidentiary burden and
. Marked out of 1.00
choose the correct option: 1111121131 14
¥ Flag question

15
@® 1. The accused bears the onus of proof regarding a defence of criminal non- responsibility
on account of mental illness or mental defect. .
Finish attempt ..
O 2. When the onus of proof in criminal matters rests upon the defence, proof beyond a
reasonable doubt is required.

O 3. At the start of a criminal trial, the state is only burdened with the burden of proof.

O 4. The Court in S v Eadie 2002 (1) SACR 663 (SCA) interprets section 78(1B) of the Criminal
Procedure Act 51 of 1977 to mean that a defence of sane automatism now imposes a
burden of proof on the accused and not merely an obligation to raise the defence.

Clear my choice




2023 / Semester2 / LEV3701-23-S2 / Welcome Message / Assessment1


Quiz navigation
Question 2


The accused is forced to point out the gun that he used to kill his wife. The gun, which has the Marked out of 1.00
accused’s fingerprints on it, will be . . _ , @
" Flag question




@ 1. admissible in terms of section 218(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. Finish attempt .

O 2. inadmissible in terms of section 218(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977.

O 3. inadmissible in terms of section 218(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977.

O 4. admissible in terms of section 218(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977.

Clear my choice




Previous page

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LIBRARYpro. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.71. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78121 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.71
  • (0)
  Add to cart