100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LJU4804 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2023 - UNISA - (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED) $8.57   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LJU4804 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2023 - UNISA - (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED)

 61 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

LJU4804 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2023 - UNISA - (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED) Mr and Mrs Hendricks got married in Madagascar in December 1999. At the time of entering into the marriage they were both Namibian citizens, domiciled in England. Mrs Hendricks move...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 13  pages

  • March 14, 2023
  • 13
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2021/2022.




LJU4804
Private International Law

ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO
SEMESTER 1 - 2023
UNIQUE NUMBER:-
Due Date :- 31 March 2023
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography

QUESTION 1


Mr and Mrs Hendricks got married in Madagascar in December 1999. At the time of entering into the marriage they
were both Namibian citizens, domiciled in England. Mrs Hendricks moved to London, England in 1997 to pursue a
modelling career. Mr Hendricks took up a permanent position as an engineer in London in 1998 and established a
domicile there. In 2001, the parties relocated to Pretoria (South Africa) and became domiciled there. The reason for
the relocation was that Mrs Hendricks was offered a long-term modelling contract by a large South African clothing
company. In 2017, Mr Hendricks instituted divorce proceedings against Mrs Hendricks in the North Gauteng High
Court.


1.1 Which legal system applies to the material validity of the marriage according to the principles of South African
private international law? (2)


Question Continues..

Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.



PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 074 074 3729 Email: llbexampacks@gmail.com
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za

, Mr and Mrs Hendricks got married in Madagascar in December 1999. At the time of
entering into the marriage they were both Namibian citizens, domiciled in England.
Mrs Hendricks moved to London, England in 1997 to pursue a modelling career. Mr
Hendricks took up a permanent position as an engineer in London in 1998 and
established a domicile there. In 2001, the parties relocated to Pretoria (South
Africa) and became domiciled there. The reason for the relocation was that Mrs
Hendricks was offered a long-term modelling contract by a large South African
clothing company. In 2017, Mr Hendricks instituted divorce proceedings against
Mrs Hendricks in the North Gauteng High Court.



1.1 Which legal system applies to the material validity of the marriage according to
the principles of South African private international law? (2)


In terms of the rules of private international law the material validity of marriage is
governed by the lex loci celebrationis that is the law of marriage celebration. The law of
marriage celebration refers to the place where the marriage was celebrated. By
virtue of the given set of facts the marriage was concluded in Mauritius meaning.
The legal system would then be Mauritian law. 1


1.2 Mrs Hendricks gave Mr Hendricks a BMW X5 vehicle (fully paid in cash by Mrs
Hendricks) in 2016. After the divorce proceedings were instituted, Mrs Hendricks
disputed the validity of this gift / donation. In terms of English law, donations
between spouses are regarded as a proprietary consequence of marriage but in
terms of South African law, donations between spouses are classified as a
personal consequence of marriage.


1.2.1 Which legal system will be applied to the validity of the gift if the via media
approach to classification is used? Motivate your answer, but you do NOT have to




1 Friedman v Friedman’s Executors and Others 1922 43 NLR 259.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LLBExampacksAndTutorials. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75759 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


$8.57  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart