100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Study Summaries for Cognitive Psychology Studies AS Level OCR $9.45   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Study Summaries for Cognitive Psychology Studies AS Level OCR

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

In this document are the 4 studies that are studied in cognitive psychology AS Level. Very thorough well written notes, giving the most important information needed for the exam. Easy to understand and read.

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • No
  • Cognitive psychology
  • October 18, 2021
  • 7
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Loftus and Palmer’s study
 Overall aim for both studies was to test whether the phrasing of a questions about
car accidents could alter participant’s memory of event

Study 1:

 Aim was to see whether using different verbs to describe a car crash would affect the
estimation of the speed at which the cars were travelling

Method:

 45 participants took part in this experiment
 No details of age or gender were recorded
 This was a lab experiment (controlled conditions) therefore lacked ecological validity

Procedure:

 Seven car crash films were shown taken from training films used by Seattle PD and
Evergreen Safety Council.
 In 4 videos, the speeds were known because crashes were staged for training
purpose (20,30,40 and 40 mph)
 Participants were then asked to write down an account of the accident and answer
questions
 Filler questions (irrelevant questions slide into a self report to disguise aim of
experiment ) were used.
 Other question was a critical question (closely concerned with the aim of the study.
This question was ‘About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’
 Independent variable was verb used: ‘hit’, ‘contacted’, ‘bumped’, ‘collided’,
‘smashed’.

Results:

 Results were in form of quantitative data as participants estimated speed at which
car was going.
 Results show that estimated speed was not affected by actual speed and estimation
was generally poor and not accurate
 Order of words with highest estimated speeds were: smashed (40.1 mph), collided,
bumped, hit, contacted (31.8 mph)

Conclusions:

 Response bias: When a participant is unclear what speed to estimate so verb give
them a clue whether to estimate high or low
 Memory distortion: Verb used in question alters participants memory of crash

, Study 2:

 Aim was to investigate whether speed estimates found in study 1 were a result of
distorted memory.
 This was done by seeing whether participants who heard the words associated with
high speed would be more likely to incorrectly remember broken glass at crash site
compared with words associated with lower speeds.

Method:

 150 students took part in experiment
 No details of age or gender were recorded
 This was a lab experiment

Procedure:

 All participants watched a film of a car crash lasting less than a minute and accident
lasting 4 seconds
 They were given a questionnaire that asked to describe accident and then answer
series of questions
 The first 50 participants received critical question being: ‘About how fast was the car
going when they smashed into each other?’
 Another 50 had: ‘About how fast was the car going when they hit each other?’
 Final 50 were a control group that were not asked questions about speed of car
 A week later, they returned and answered 10 questions, critical question being ‘Did
you see any broken glass?’

Results:

 Participants who heard the word ‘smashed’ were more than twice more likely to
have answered yes than hearing the word ‘hit’
 Smashed (16 answered yes), hit (7 answered yes) and control (6 answered yes)

Conclusions:

 Wording of a question can distort memory
 Remembrance of events isn’t just response bias but mainly memory distortion




Grant’s study
 The aim was to test the effect of noise as a source of context on the studying and
retrieval of meaningful material

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller cate_procaccini. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.45. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79789 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.45
  • (0)
  Add to cart